More details. "Data-ellipsis \u003d" "\u003e Standard size	Read more here "\u003e Read more here"\u003e IP ID	Read more here "\u003e IN	Read more here "\u003e IP	The price does not include shipping costs. Discounts on discount cards are provided only for services. The price for tires and wheels is already indicated with a discount, additional discounts are not available. "\u003e Price	In stock	Buy. "data-ellipsis \u003d" "\u003e Buy
R14
27 / 8.5 R14	95Q	95	Q	8800 RUB	2 PC.

Description Kumho Road Venture MT KL71 (winter)

Korean tire KumhoRoad VentureMTKL71

Kumho Road Venture MT KL71

• Self-cleaning.

• Strength.
• Acoustic comfort.
• Stability along the course.

Synonyms:

More details. "Data-ellipsis \u003d" "\u003e Standard size	Read more here "\u003e Read more here"\u003e IP ID	Read more here "\u003e IN	Read more here "\u003e IP	The price does not include shipping costs. Discounts on discount cards are provided only for services. The price for tires and wheels is already indicated with a discount, additional discounts are not available. "\u003e Price	In stock	To buy a product - click the button Buy. "data-ellipsis \u003d" "\u003e Buy
R15
195/0 R15	100Q	100	Q	not available	0 pcs.	not available
215/75 R15	106 / 103Q	106/103	Q	not available	0 pcs.	not available
R16
205/0 R16	104Q	104	Q	not available	0 pcs.	not available
225/75 R16	115 / 112Q	115/112	Q	not available	0 pcs.	not available
235/85 R16	120 / 116Q	120/116	Q	not available	0 pcs.	not available
245/75 R16	120 / 116Q	120/116	Q	not available	0 pcs.	not available
R17
265/70 R17	Q		Q	not available	0 pcs.	not available
R17C
265/70 R17C	121 / 118Q	121/118	Q	not available	0 pcs.	not available

Kumho Road Venture MT KL71 off-road tire

Korean tire KumhoRoad VentureMTKL71 installed on all-wheel drive vehicles. The tire belongs to the category of extreme M / T tires. The designer provided the product with an oversized rim and aggressive tread pattern to maximize flotation. The product is highly efficient in rocky terrain, exhibits good braking properties on gravel roads and is self-cleaning. Speed \u200b\u200bindex - Q (160 km / h).

Tire specifications Kumho Road Venture MT KL71

The engineers applied advanced technical solutions in the tire design, which ensured the tire's cross-country ability in difficult conditions:

• Self-cleaning. Lugs located on the side of the shoulders push the tire through the mud. The open tread design helps drain water and snow slurry. Wide drainage channels prevent aquaplaning and stabilize grip on wet surfaces.

• Strength. The manufacturer has built the tire on the basis of a two-layer tread, which has increased resistance to mechanical stress and tensile strength.
• Acoustic comfort. The manufacturer has placed an additional spacer between the tread layer and the steel frame structure, which levels out resonance vibrations. Reduces the noise level that the tire creates when rolling.
• Stability along the course. Aggressive double rib located in the center of the tread improves directional stability and improves steering response.

The Kumho Road Venture MT KL71 tire offers traction on rough terrain and performance on muddy, gravel and country roads. The tire can also be used on permanent surfaces. It is recommended to install the product on four-wheel drive vehicles.

Synonyms:Kumho Road Venture MT KL71, Kumho Road Venture MT KL71, Kumho Road Venture MT KL71, Kumho Road Venture MT KL 71, Kumho Road Venture MTK El 71.

We continue to deal with off-road tires, this topic is quite interesting and this hobby can also "get sick" very quickly and dream in a dream how you "shod" your SUV in cool rubber and set off to conquer the off-road. In general, another great rubber, read on.

So, scouring the forums and sites, I came across another excellent option for mud tires, a tire of the Mud Terrain class, which means that the tire is completely off-road, when it is not recommended to drive on the highway. 80 percent for mud / clay and swamp riding and 20 percent for trails. If you drive on such a tire most of the time on asphalt, then it wears out very quickly, enough for a couple of seasons. Considering that the cost of a tire is above average, then use it strictly for its intended purpose, so to speak)) Here is such a wonderful MT-rubber:

Sizes and prices:

Below is a small and useful plate with dimensions and prices so that you can choose the most suitable size for your car and find out the prices. See the passport of your car, if you already know the size, then it's generally excellent.

So, we figured out the prices, now let's look at the photos of this gorgeous rubber, how great it looks on your car, giving it a very serious look. At least, when not so long ago I saw the Oise Patriot on Cumho Road Ventura, many turned after him. The Oise looked very impressive, he was a big car himself, and even the tires were wide. Needless to say, the appearance is also important. We look at the photo:

An ordinary UAZ is still a tank.

There are a lot of Nivas (regular and Chevrolet):

As you can see, if you are picking up mud MD-shnuyu rubber for trips on mud / clay, then this model is a very good option. Why? Let's figure it out, because there are pros and cons, which are "drawn" solely because of the operating conditions.

Pros of rubber

• Very large tread pattern, the chance of "smearing" the rubber is reduced
• Powerful side hooks - easier to get out of the rut
• Self-cleaning - at a height, also because of the tread pattern
• Soft, so it can be used as an all-season (that is, in winter too)
• The tread pattern is directional, so if you do get stuck, it will be easier to drive back.
• One hundred percent "mud" rubber, completely suitable for driving on clay in any weather
• Strong, thick, impenetrable for small screws

If you often use it on asphalt / highway / highway, it will wear off very quickly, enough for a couple of seasons.
Compared to conventional AT rubber, this one adds a little fuel consumption.
"Thanks to" directional tread pattern, the spare wheel will be difficult to find
It is comfortable to drive along the highway up to 100-110 km / h, then - you yourself understand)) Shaking, hum, vibration, etc.

A couple of tips for those who have bought and used:

For greater cross-country ability, you can release the pressure to one atmosphere, your jeep will become a tank.
Try to ride on soft surfaces though, as Mud Terrain is made for mud.

Video Niva on rubber Kumho Ventura

And finally, to reinforce in you the confidence that you need to take this particular rubber 🙂 - video of the off-road arrival of Niva, shod in Kumho. Tire size 215 / 75R15. Pay attention to 35 seconds - a very tough moment, but Niva did it. As you can see, the tires are very decent.

Mud model of the middle price category. Friends with asphalt, allows you to ride on moderate off-road. Take a closer look if you:

• ride a lot in the city and on the track
• if you want to go hunting or fishing freely, have an active rest in nature
• off-road, most often you deal with primers and rocky surfaces
• love comfort
• looking for budget options

tread pattern Kumho Road Venture M / T KL71

Key Features of the Kumho Road Venture M / T KL71 Off-Road Tire

• Tread Type: Directional, Symmetrical, Mud Terrain
• Diameter: R14-R24
• Profile: high, in some standard sizes full
• Speed \u200b\u200bindex: Q (160 km / h)
• Lifting capacity index: 100-110 (690-1750 kg per wheel)
• Grip on wet asphalt: С-F
• Fuel consumption: E-G
• Noise level: 76-78 dB
• Outside diameter: 27-38 inches
• Width: 8.5-15.5 inches
• Drawing depth: 14-16.8mm
• Reinforced XL sidewall: available in some sizes
• Production: South Korea, China

Kumho Road Venture M / T KL71 on a Ford off-road pickup

Feedback from drivers: advantages and disadvantages of Kumho Road Venture MT CL 71

Kumho is not well known in the mud rubber market. In purely off-road parameters, their tires are not yet very competitive with the classic off-road monsters. Nevertheless, the energetic and fast-growing company has something to offer in order to interest Jeepers not just with words. There are a number of interesting chips and advantages, which we will dwell on in more detail - practice shows that the KL71 definitely deserves attention and is able to please many, especially considering its price.

Asphalt

Usually harsh mudas are very sad on the pavement. They can ride, but because of large checkers and vibration it will not be very comfortable even on a perfectly flat track. Advanced manufacturers come up with various tricks, but top-end products, where this issue is resolved, are very expensive. Simpler models, as a rule, are sharpened off-road, the quality of driving on an asphalt road is rarely a priority for anyone. With the KL71 differently, this model adopts the traditional properties of Kumho rubber - softness, silence and elasticity.

Let's say right away - don't expect street-racing properties and perfect noiselessness here, because it's still Mud Terrain. However, we can say for sure that the acoustic load with this shoe will be significantly lower than that of most types of mud rubber. Bumps are well extinguished, holes are easily passed, a dead road on a remote periphery does not create problems. Long runs on highways and everyday driving in the city will not shake the interior and will not provoke a headache from sound overload, which will definitely appeal to those who have no desire to buy separate wheels for outings, who ride on the same tires in their everyday life, and on a rest. In addition, asphalt comfort will not be superfluous if you get far to wild places.

Driving properties, when compared with other mudas, are average, but quite decent. The steering wheel is informative, the road is felt, there is a hook, but sharp maneuvers are contraindicated, there can be problems with obedience to a heavy car. On dry roads there may be slippage - keep your distance, do not step on the accelerator more often than necessary. With a wet road, it is normal in terms of hitching, but on puddles there will be aquaplaning starting from about 80-90 km / h.

Priming

Calmly rides on any dirt road, including muddy soil with potholes and bumps. The ride is relatively comfortable, the softness of the rubber compensates for the shaking. Pulls well uphill, adequately on wet grass. Forest trails and fields are available in all weather conditions. Sand - you can ride, but be careful not to bury yourself with the accelerator.

Kumho Road Venture M / T KL71 off-road

Stones and rocks

Grips well, paddles on gravel, rides on rocky terrain without problems. Small stones do not get stuck. Mountain roads with dense rocky ground are overcome without the slightest effort.

Clay and mud

Light to moderate dirt will not present any particular problem if it is liquid enough and there is a solid bottom. Difficulties with self-cleaning will be on clay and in deep bays with a viscous liquid.

The KL71 is fine if you don’t consider mud as a separate off-road discipline and all you need is the ability to drive where an unpleasant and dangerous puddle blocking the road. If you need any special advantages on the head, look for more themed tires.

Remember that you need to drive vnatyag through mud, in a low gear, so as not to bury yourself. It is better to lower the pressure in the tires, but after returning to a solid surface, pump it back up - the KL71 is not adapted to long-term driving with flat tires, there is a risk of disassembly.

Snow, ice

Closer to zero, KL71 hardens and begins to lose its beneficial properties. Some performance will be retained on snow and porridge due to the sparseness of the tread and the ability to self-cleaning, but the tires will slip on ice and packed snow. On the asphalt, controllability will fall, braking will become more difficult. It makes sense to use this model all year round closer to southern latitudes, where ice is rare. In all other cases, it is better to buy winter tires for the winter.

Additional nuances

• satisfactory strength - worse than the leaders in the mud segment, but much better than MT tires of the same softness
• wear resistance below average
• Road Venture M / T KL71 is a fairly popular model among owners of domestic cars

Mud rubber Kumho Road Venture MT CL 71: description from the manufacturer, technology

Drawing

Sharp polygonal blocks form an abundance of effective grip points. The massiveness of the design elements protects the tire from punctures. The lugs, passing to the side surface, improve the permeability on viscous and loose substrates and protect from side cuts. The checkerboard layout and eccentricity of the checkers increase traction on rocks and uneven asphalt. At the bottom of the grooves in the shoulder area, there are stone removers, which protect the protector from pebbles getting stuck between the blocks.

Structure

The two-layer cord stabilizes the tire structure and increases its strength. The steel belt takes the brunt of the shock and improves puncture immunity. There is a damping layer between the belt and the treadmill, which dampens vibrations and improves cabin comfort. The softness of the rubber and the absence of overheating due to the optimized heat distribution help to reduce contact noise when driving.

Advantages:

Moderately noisy, wear-resistant, not a single puncture in 2 years.

Disadvantages:

Not friendly with the track. If you hit it, you will stay there. Even the native (for a loaf) kama does not behave like that. On the Kama I got into a rut, and when you need to - I left. It doesn't work that way on an RV. I thought that with the side lugs on the RV, the track was no big deal. Wrong. It gets washed out quickly.

Comments:

In principle, for that kind of money, quite good tires. Stones, sand, dirt (not only mud) are on the drum. In the black soil I burrow myself to the eggs from time to time, nothing, I leave.

Advantages:

Rows well in mud: clay, black earth, sand, if bleed, rides well. Rides until you sit on the bridges, it's worth your money. It took 3 summers and 2 winters, the remainder of the tread was 3 mm., About 90 t.km. Strong, not a single puncture or side cut. You forget about the holes, hernias appeared on the front wheels only for 3 years of ruthless exploitation ...

Disadvantages:

A bit heavy, quickly erased on the asphalt, average noise.

Comments:

I flew into the pits along the axis, withstood everything, checked! I was satisfied! It's definitely worth its money.

Advantages:

Appearance, cross-country ability, the car has grown by 0.8 mm

Disadvantages:

Diesel fuel consumption.

Comments:

Installed on the stock Chiron 275/75 / R16 operation 90% asphalt 10% dirt + 1. permeability has become much better! 2. Full turned on less often! 3. the ground clearance has increased (but not much, maximum 1 cm)! 4. the car began to look more harmonious! 5.Is not planning on puddles - 1.the consumption increased (2000 rubles per tank and the maximum on country roads could reach 500 km) 2.the acceleration increased (at first it was very annoying then I got used to it) 3.the speed decreased, on average, it became 100-120 km ... I bought it a new one in September 2016 for 7000r per cylinder. when buying, they even tried to dissuade, but could not) tried to ride it in the winter, I liked the fields and forests, but in the city in winter there is definitely NO! I like!

Advantages:

The rowing is excellent (mud, sand, puddles), puddles are not felt, even at a decent speed, just like a country road with a fair share of dust, it cleans well, jumps out of the rut (and jumps on curbs just as well if you rub it sideways))) ), soft.

Disadvantages:

At a speed of more than 80, it begins to make a noticeable noise, it is difficult to drive over long distances, then there is a hum in the ears, at a speed of 120 the road control leaves much to be desired, and if you accelerate more than 120 you start to feel like a suicide bomber. With a sharp braking, the car jumps up.)))) (For the first time from surprise prifigela). Heavy (although I can only compare with the highway).

Comments:

Stands on a Chevrolet Niva (R15 75 215 with the steering wheel fully twisted to the side in the arches wipes). She covered about 35-40 thousand km in four seasons. She would not have been demolished if it had not been for the killed alignment (it was like new, but due to the wrong alignment, it was demolished in a week). In my size it is almost impossible to find, and when I bought it, all the stores were filled up with it. I don’t climb into swamps, but four years of confident fishing trip, and far away into the forest, where there are only directions from the roads. On the track, I pump 2.5 atmospheres, if I lower it to 2.2, it goes much harder. Compared with winter tires, the difference in acceleration on asphalt is noticeable, on kumho it is noticeably harder. I am very pleased with the rubber.

Advantages:

2.5 years without punctures and repairs, LT model with reinforced sidewall. While the new one does not make much noise and rides tolerably through the mud.

Disadvantages:

The cross-country ability of a car in mud, (namely in mud, and not on soggy primers) quickly sharpens on the asphalt and starts to make noise.

Comments:

I will not say about the behavior on the asphalt and the fuel consumption, it is of little interest to me, and I don’t even remember how the car behaved on road tires. I am writing for those who plan to use tires for their intended purpose - off-road, since I use the car myself exclusively for weekend rides. Average mileage for an exit is 200-300 km, of which 20-40 km. the rest is asphalt. For various primers, it may not be bad, but in the real dirt of Moscow and neighboring regions it rides mediocre, so that it drives acceptable, you have to bleed off to 0.5 atm, and at this pressure there is a risk of taking off your shoes. With wear and tear, the permeability drops sharply, and the noise increases. It practically does not leave the track, there are no side lugs, this is visually visible. Like MT, rubber is rather weak. For ~ 25 thousand km, the remainder of the tread is 7-9 mm, it’s already dumb to drive off the road, the cross-country ability became like that of a weak AT.

Advantages:

Passability Silent

Disadvantages:

It is better to entrust the installation to the pros

Advantages:

1. Good choice of sizes on R 15 and 16. 2. Quiet on asphalt 3. Strong

Disadvantages:

1. It is quickly erased, unlike the same BFG or Cooper. 2. Severe 3.

Comments:

I bought it in the amount of 245/75/16 for the stock "Patriot" in April this year, though it cost me 2 times cheaper then (5880 rubles per bottle) than it costs now. I chose between this and BFG KM2, the choice fell in the direction of KL. Mainly due to the price, it is significantly cheaper. Rows well in the mud (here, of course, depending on what to compare with, it is almost 30 km to the village on a broken dirt road, after rain on bald tires it is impossible to drive at all). On the asphalt, of course, it is erased quickly, on the front end it has probably already worn about 5mm (from April to December). I think it will last 1.5 years, and then everything will be erased. It is better not to drive it on asphalt. The money that they ask for her now is not worth it!

Advantages:

Rows very well, is quite stable on the road, does not feel puddles at speed, gently walks along potholes))

Disadvantages:

Very heavy, noisy !, there is something to compare from MT,

Comments:

The second MT rubber, on my MPS2, what I want to say, this rubber is not for long trips, it is heavy, fuel consumption increases several times, it seemed to me hard on it, when compared with the hankuk MT-noise, like in an airplane, despite the fact that I have additional noise, the previous rubber I had was HankukMT, and so it did not make any noise at all, I drove it on it and on the sea across the sands and to Astrakhan, I did not feel much heaviness, and with this one I even got a little upset ((, but otherwise everything is fine , on mud, it's just super and clay and getting out of the cli, everything is super.On wet asphalt it goes very confidently and steadily, skated somewhere 6 thousand, I plan to change it, it's very hard with her over long distances ((

Advantages:

Quiet, reasonable price, evil drawing.

Disadvantages:

Rows normally only if it is baited less than 1

Comments:

Stands on the lifted Shniva 235/75/15. I operate it everywhere, from commuting to preparing tracks for competitions. Most of all, the rubber is suitable for expeditions, as it is very quiet and can row well in light off-road. But all the same, you definitely need to poison at least up to 0.8 (but here it is already easy to take off your shoes). Otherwise he does not want to go, let alone get out of the rut. For real shit ... it is not suitable, after all, it is more AT than MT. In the spring, I will take more suitable for off-road and in a larger size. And I'll leave this one for expeditions and pokatushki, this is her element

Advantages:

It behaves confidently and predictably on any type of surface, except for pure ice, not noisy, soft, in mud and snow it is better not to try to "taxi", but to let the tires do their job and only slightly adjust the direction, tested on a wet potato field, in a swamp (bog) did not climb, but crawls out of the mud "above" the hub without any problems.

Disadvantages:

when braking sharply from a speed above 80 km / h, it prowls, but you can hold it without problems

Comments:

car - Patriot 2014, without OFFROAD tuning

ROAD VENTURE MT KL71 all-season tire from Kumho, made for large SUVs. The tires are positioned as versatile and are well suited for driving on any road surface and temperature.

ROAD VENTURE MT KL71 all-season tire from Kumho, made for large SUVs. The tires are positioned as versatile and are well suited for driving on any road surface and temperature. A rigid center rib with a zig-zag tread pattern provides excellent handling and quick steering response. A special deep pattern maximally prevents clogging of the tread and its fast self-cleaning. Kumho ROAD VENTURE MT KL71 tires, look very impressive and are perfect as a tuning element for a large SUV. The drainage channels are excellent at draining water away from the contact point. You can buy ROAD VENTURE MT KL71 tires in the Euro Disks store at a low price.

★★★★ good model

Advantages:

Moderately noisy, wear-resistant, not a single puncture in 2 years.

Disadvantages:

Not friendly with the track. If you hit it, you will stay there. Even the native (for a loaf) kama does not behave like that. On the Kama I got into a rut, and when you need to - I left. It doesn't work that way on an RV. I thought that with the side lugs on the RV, the track was no big deal. Wrong. It gets washed out quickly.

Comment:

In principle, for that kind of money, quite good tires. Stones, sand, dirt (not only mud) are on the drum. In the black soil I burrow myself to the eggs from time to time, nothing, I leave.

★★★★ good model Experience of use: Several years

Advantages:

Rows well in mud: clay, black earth, sand, if bleed, rides well. Rides until you sit on the bridges, it's worth your money. It took 3 summers and 2 winters, the remainder of the tread was 3 mm., About 90 t.km. Strong, not a single puncture or side cut. You forget about the holes, hernias appeared on the front wheels only for 3 years of ruthless exploitation ...

Disadvantages:

A bit heavy, quickly erased on the asphalt, average noise.

Comment:

I flew into the pits along the axis, withstood everything, checked! I was satisfied! It's definitely worth its money.

★★★★★ great model Experience of use: Several months

Advantages:

Appearance, cross-country ability, the car has grown by 0.8 mm

Disadvantages:

Diesel fuel consumption.

Comment:

Installed on the stock Chiron 275/75 / R16 operation 90% asphalt 10% dirt + 1. permeability has become much better! 2. Full turned on less often! 3. the ground clearance has increased (but not much, maximum 1 cm)! 4. the car began to look more harmonious! 5.Is not planning on puddles - 1.the consumption increased (2000 rubles per tank and the maximum on country roads could reach 500 km) 2.the acceleration increased (at first it was very annoying then I got used to it) 3.the speed decreased, on average, it became 100-120 km ... I bought it a new one in September 2016 for 7000r per cylinder. when buying, they even tried to dissuade, but could not) tried to ride it in the winter, I liked the fields and forests, but in the city in winter there is definitely NO! I like!

★★★★★ great model Experience of use: Several years

Advantages:

The rowing is excellent (mud, sand, puddles), puddles are not felt, even at a decent speed, just like a country road with a fair share of dust, it cleans well, jumps out of the rut (and jumps on curbs just as well if you rub it sideways))) ), soft.

Disadvantages:

At a speed of more than 80, it begins to make a noticeable noise, it is difficult to drive over long distances, then there is a hum in the ears, at a speed of 120 the road control leaves much to be desired, and if you accelerate more than 120 you start to feel like a suicide bomber. With a sharp braking, the car jumps up.)))) (For the first time from surprise prifigela). Heavy (although I can only compare with the highway).

Comment:

Stands on a Chevrolet Niva (R15 75 215 with the steering wheel fully twisted to the side in the arches wipes). She covered about 35-40 thousand km in four seasons. She would not have been demolished if it had not been for the killed alignment (it was like new, but due to the wrong alignment, it was demolished in a week). In my size it is almost impossible to find, and when I bought it, all the stores were filled up with it. I don’t climb into swamps, but four years of confident fishing trip, and far away into the forest, where there are only directions from the roads. On the track, I pump 2.5 atmospheres, if I lower it to 2.2, it goes much harder. Compared with winter tires, the difference in acceleration on asphalt is noticeable, on kumho it is noticeably harder. I am very pleased with the rubber.

Advantages:

Moderately noisy, wear-resistant, not a single puncture in 2 years.

Disadvantages:

Not friendly with the track. If you hit it, you will stay there. Even the native (for a loaf) kama does not behave like that. On the Kama I got into a rut, and when you need to - I left. It doesn't work that way on an RV. I thought that with the side lugs on the RV, the track was no big deal. Wrong. It gets washed out quickly.

Comments:

In principle, for that kind of money, quite good tires. Stones, sand, dirt (not only mud) are on the drum. In the black soil I burrow myself to the eggs from time to time, nothing, I leave.

Advantages:

Rows well in mud: clay, black earth, sand, if bleed, rides well. Rides until you sit on the bridges, it's worth your money. It took 3 summers and 2 winters, the remainder of the tread was 3 mm., About 90 t.km. Strong, not a single puncture or side cut. You forget about the holes, hernias appeared on the front wheels only for 3 years of ruthless exploitation ...

Disadvantages:

A bit heavy, quickly erased on the asphalt, average noise.

Comments:

I flew into the pits along the axis, withstood everything, checked! I was satisfied! It's definitely worth its money.

Advantages:

Appearance, cross-country ability, the car has grown by 0.8 mm

Disadvantages:

Diesel fuel consumption.

Comments:

Installed on the stock Chiron 275/75 / R16 operation 90% asphalt 10% dirt + 1. permeability has become much better! 2. Full turned on less often! 3. the ground clearance has increased (but not much, maximum 1 cm)! 4. the car began to look more harmonious! 5.Is not planning on puddles - 1.the consumption increased (2000 rubles per tank and the maximum on country roads could reach 500 km) 2.the acceleration increased (at first it was very annoying then I got used to it) 3.the speed decreased, on average, it became 100-120 km ... I bought it a new one in September 2016 for 7000r per cylinder. when buying, they even tried to dissuade, but could not) tried to ride it in the winter, I liked the fields and forests, but in the city in winter there is definitely NO! I like!

Advantages:

The rowing is excellent (mud, sand, puddles), puddles are not felt, even at a decent speed, just like a country road with a fair share of dust, it cleans well, jumps out of the rut (and jumps on curbs just as well if you rub it sideways))) ), soft.

Disadvantages:

At a speed of more than 80, it begins to make a noticeable noise, it is difficult to drive over long distances, then there is a hum in the ears, at a speed of 120 the road control leaves much to be desired, and if you accelerate more than 120 you start to feel like a suicide bomber. With a sharp braking, the car jumps up.)))) (For the first time from surprise prifigela). Heavy (although I can only compare with the highway).

Comments:

Stands on a Chevrolet Niva (R15 75 215 with the steering wheel fully twisted to the side in the arches wipes). She covered about 35-40 thousand km in four seasons. She would not have been demolished if it had not been for the killed alignment (it was like new, but due to the wrong alignment, it was demolished in a week). In my size it is almost impossible to find, and when I bought it, all the stores were filled up with it. I don’t climb into swamps, but four years of confident fishing trip, and far away into the forest, where there are only directions from the roads. On the track, I pump 2.5 atmospheres, if I lower it to 2.2, it goes much harder. Compared with winter tires, the difference in acceleration on asphalt is noticeable, on kumho it is noticeably harder. I am very pleased with the rubber.

Advantages:

2.5 years without punctures and repairs, LT model with reinforced sidewall. While the new one does not make much noise and rides tolerably through the mud.

Disadvantages:

The cross-country ability of a car in mud, (namely in mud, and not on soggy primers) quickly sharpens on the asphalt and starts to make noise.

Comments:

I will not say about the behavior on the asphalt and the fuel consumption, it is of little interest to me, and I don’t even remember how the car behaved on road tires. I am writing for those who plan to use tires for their intended purpose - off-road, since I use the car myself exclusively for weekend rides. Average mileage for an exit is 200-300 km, of which 20-40 km. the rest is asphalt. For various primers, it may not be bad, but in the real dirt of Moscow and neighboring regions it rides mediocre, so that it drives acceptable, you have to bleed off to 0.5 atm, and at this pressure there is a risk of taking off your shoes. With wear and tear, the permeability drops sharply, and the noise increases. It practically does not leave the track, there are no side lugs, this is visually visible. Like MT, rubber is rather weak. For ~ 25 thousand km, the remainder of the tread is 7-9 mm, it’s already dumb to drive off the road, the cross-country ability became like that of a weak AT.

Advantages:

Passability Silent

Disadvantages:

It is better to entrust the installation to the pros

Advantages:

1. Good choice of sizes on R 15 and 16. 2. Quiet on asphalt 3. Strong

Disadvantages:

1. It is quickly erased, unlike the same BFG or Cooper. 2. Severe 3.

Comments:

I bought it in the amount of 245/75/16 for the stock "Patriot" in April this year, though it cost me 2 times cheaper then (5880 rubles per bottle) than it costs now. I chose between this and BFG KM2, the choice fell in the direction of KL. Mainly due to the price, it is significantly cheaper. Rows well in the mud (here, of course, depending on what to compare with, it is almost 30 km to the village on a broken dirt road, after rain on bald tires it is impossible to drive at all). On the asphalt, of course, it is erased quickly, on the front end it has probably already worn about 5mm (from April to December). I think it will last 1.5 years, and then everything will be erased. It is better not to drive it on asphalt. The money that they ask for her now is not worth it!

Advantages:

Rows very well, is quite stable on the road, does not feel puddles at speed, gently walks along potholes))

Disadvantages:

Very heavy, noisy !, there is something to compare from MT,

Comments:

The second MT rubber, on my MPS2, what I want to say, this rubber is not for long trips, it is heavy, fuel consumption increases several times, it seemed to me hard on it, when compared with the hankuk MT-noise, like in an airplane, despite the fact that I have additional noise, the previous rubber I had was HankukMT, and so it did not make any noise at all, I drove it on it and on the sea across the sands and to Astrakhan, I did not feel much heaviness, and with this one I even got a little upset ((, but otherwise everything is fine , on mud, it's just super and clay and getting out of the cli, everything is super.On wet asphalt it goes very confidently and steadily, skated somewhere 6 thousand, I plan to change it, it's very hard with her over long distances ((

Advantages:

Quiet, reasonable price, evil drawing.

Disadvantages:

Rows normally only if it is baited less than 1

Comments:

Stands on the lifted Shniva 235/75/15. I operate it everywhere, from commuting to preparing tracks for competitions. Most of all, the rubber is suitable for expeditions, as it is very quiet and can row well in light off-road. But all the same, you definitely need to poison at least up to 0.8 (but here it is already easy to take off your shoes). Otherwise he does not want to go, let alone get out of the rut. For real shit ... it is not suitable, after all, it is more AT than MT. In the spring, I will take more suitable for off-road and in a larger size. And I'll leave this one for expeditions and pokatushki, this is her element

Advantages:

It behaves confidently and predictably on any type of surface, except for pure ice, not noisy, soft, in mud and snow it is better not to try to "taxi", but to let the tires do their job and only slightly adjust the direction, tested on a wet potato field, in a swamp (bog) did not climb, but crawls out of the mud "above" the hub without any problems.