Renault Captur is a French compact crossover based on the budget Renault Duster model. In fact, this is a completely different car, more modern and technologically advanced. It wins over Duster in all respects - handling, dynamics, chassis tuning and handling, high-quality interior and more advanced finishing materials. Renault Captur production in Russia began in 2016. The Duster is among the most popular crossovers in the country, along with the Hyundai Creta, Renault Duster and Chevrolet Niva. Also, the model is the closest competitor to the Japanese car Nissan Terrano, which is also a more top-end variant of the Duster.

Navigation

Renault Captur alternative engines

Gasoline:

• 0.9, 90 liters. sec., mechanics, 12.9 seconds to 100 km / h, 6 / 4.3 liters per 100 km
• 1.2, 120 liters. sec., robot, 10.9 seconds to 100 km / h, 6.6 / 4.7 liters per 100 km

Diesel:

• 1.5, 90 liters. sec., mechanics, 13.1 seconds to 100 km / h, 4.2 / 3.4 liters per 100 km
• 1.5, 90 liters. sec., robot, 13.5 seconds to 100 km / h, 4.6 / 3.6 liters per 100 km
• 1.5, 110 l. sec., mechanics, 11 seconds to 100 km / h, 4 / 3.6 liters per 100 km

Renault Captur owner reviews

With 1.6 manual gearbox engine

• Sergey, Nizhny Novgorod region. Car in 2016, bought a new one at the showroom. I would take a supported one, but they only started selling them last year ... Therefore, I decided to save money and took the basic configuration, with a 1.6-liter gasoline engine. The car suits, stylish and dynamic, despite the rather modest engine. The economy is quite at the level, the average consumption in the city is not more than 10 liters per hundred. There is a manual transmission.
• Nikita, Perm. I'm happy with the car, this is my first crossover, before it was a VAZ-2107. In fact, this is my second car, with a comfortable suspension and a high-torque 1.6 engine. A decent car for every day, much steeper than the soplatform Renault Duster, consumes no more than 10 liters of gasoline.
• Nina, Yaroslavl. A wonderful crossover, beautiful on the outside and functional on the inside. Spacious interior, fairly high-quality finishing materials, groovy 1.6-liter engine. Consumption 9-10 liters per hundred.
• Mikhail, Yekaterinoslavl. The car costs its money, I have a 1.6-liter Capture with a manual transmission. Liked the dynamics and handling, the consumption of 8-9 liters.
  Alexander, Krasnoyarsk. A decent crossover, perfect for the city and the highway. Omnivorous suspension, like Renault Duster. At the same time, the car is better controlled. The car suits me, consumes 9-10 liters.
• Nikita, Perm. I thought for a long time what to choose - either Duster or Captyur. At first glance, the answer is obvious, but price is everything. And then I thought that maybe later I will regret not overpaying for a more modern and relevant car, besides, Duster is already outdated, and its new generation will soon be released. In general, I bought a Kaptyur with a 1.6 engine and mechanics. Weighed all the pros and cons, did not regret it. I liked the car, it consumes an average of 9-10 liters.

With 1.6 engine robot

• Ekaterina, Novorossiysk. Super car, bought with my husband. The car is equipped with a 1.6-liter engine powered by a robot. The box seemed a little thoughtful, but it's almost imperceptible. At least, the disadvantages are felt only when overtaking. And so all the rules, the economy is sufficient - in the urban cycle you can keep within 10-11 liters. I liked the fit, comfortable seats, and on the back sofa you can fit three short riders.
• Denis, Moscow region. I liked the car, a cool car for every day. In the urban cycle, Captyur consumes 11 liters, the robot is a little thoughtful, but despite this, it can accelerate to 200 km / h.
• Dmitry, Rostov. My Renault Captur has a 1.6-liter setup that's perfect for a lightweight crossover. In addition, it is compact and actively driven, just for the city. Average consumption of 10-11 liters per hundred.
• Oleg, Stavropol Territory. Great car, versatile and for every day. I think the Kaptur is much better than the Duster in terms of equipment, handling and comfort. The crossover consumes 10-11 liters, is equipped with a robot and all the options.
• Alexander, Lipetsk. The car suits, stylish and active car, but it is a typical crossover, not suitable for off-road. I drive mainly in the city, the average consumption is 10 liters - with a robot and a 1.6-liter.
• Daniel, Vorkuta. I used to have a Renault Duster, a reliable but boring car, unimpressive, sat down and drove off as they say. I wanted something new, more fashionable and modern. Captur came in handy for me. Equipped with a 1.6-liter engine and a robotic gearbox. Gasoline consumption per hundred is on average 10 liters, you can not be afraid to fill the 95th gasoline of any company.
• Nikita, Chelyabinsk. A versatile car - fast on the highway and nimble in the city, very compact and easy to park. The car is more economical than my former Renault Duster. And in general, Captyur is better than Duster in all respects, take, for example, at least a more modern design and high-quality materials. Average fuel consumption with a robot and a motor consumes 10-11 liters.
• Semyon, Ulyanovsk. Standing car, maximum consumption 11 liters per hundred I have a 1.6-liter version with a robot that clicks gears smoothly and without noticeable delays. Good handling and effective brakes.

With engine 2.0 manual transmission

• Vlad, Yekaterinoslavl. My Kaptyur is equipped with a 2-liter engine and a manual transmission, consumes 10 liters per hundred. The car suits, it can accelerate to 200 km / h without any problems. The crossover has great potential, I continue to study this wonderful car, now the mileage is 45 thousand km.
• Alexander, Tula region. I bought Kaptur in 2016, with a manual transmission and a two-liter gasoline engine and manual transmission. Average fuel consumption is 10-11 liters. The car is generally satisfied. I will say more that Renault Captur is much better than its competitors, including the same Renault Captur. Satisfied with the car, Kaptyur economical in the city and dynamic on the track. I have never regretted that I took the manual transmission version. Acceleration to hundreds in 11 seconds, maximum speed exceeds 200 km / h.
• Nikita, Perm. The car suits, the car is just for my needs. Of course, the car is still under warranty - I bought it in 2016. Serve at official dealers regularly, never miss. There are no complaints about reliability yet, I will only buy original spare parts. Average consumption of 10 liters per hundred.
• Vitaly, Lipetsk. Cool car, bought it in 2016 on pre-order. I am proud to be one of the first owners of this car. I chose a two-liter version with mechanics, it consumes an average of 11 liters.
• Vladislav, Kazan. The car pleasantly surprised me, it rides like a more prestigious car, on a par with the Nissan X-Trail of the previous generation. In addition, Captyur looks more stylish than Hyundai Creta - the best-selling crossover in Russia - I read today's statistics. A 2.0 engine with mechanics consumes an average of 9-11 liters.
• Sergey, Vorkuta. My Renault Captur has become a worthy replacement for my old lady Toyota RAV4 of the second generation. For daily trips, for the city and for the highway, for family and household needs. In short, Renault Captrure is a versatile vehicle, a full-fledged crossover. Equipped with 2.0 motor and mechanics. Average consumption of 11 liters per hundred.
• Vasily, Arkhangelsk. Comfortable and dynamic car, like the Kaptur crossover suits me. As an SUV - a controversial issue. Consumption 10-11 liters.
• Igor, Vologda region. Decent car, hardy and suitable for our roads. In severe frost, the engine starts up in half a turn. Overall, the vehicle is perceived to be reliable and versatile. The engine is 2.0 and consumes a maximum of 12 liters during dynamic driving.

With engine 2.0 Variator

• Andrey, Yaroslavl. The car is impressive, a car for every day. A two-liter engine with a gun consumes 12 liters. Renault Capture became my dream car as soon as I bought it. It happens, I just realized it. I'm leaning towards the fact that I drove 20 thousand km and was convinced of the right choice. Average consumption 11-12 liters.
• Semyon, St. Petersburg. A car-fire, at least in my top-end configuration. With a 2.0 engine and automatic transmission, it eats from 10 to 12 liters per hundred.
• Oleg, Petrozavodsk. I have Renault Captur in the most top-end configuration, to walk like that. All options, the box is mechanical. I think that it is not necessary to turn off such a powerful engine with an old machine gun. The automatic machine works flawlessly, perfectly matched gear row. The car is more than satisfying, and every day gives pleasure to the ride. The engine turned out to be very economical, with an average consumption of 10-12 liters.
• Vladislav, Perm. A decent car, the top-end version with a gun. I thought about taking it with a gun, but for sure I would have regretted it later. According to reviews and test drives, I read that the machine is thoughtful, and does not fully reveal the potential of the motor. Consumes 10-12 liters of gasoline per hundred kilos.
• Dmitry, Ulyanovsk. A car for all occasions, a comfortable and powerful car for every day. I liked the design, the crossover looks very stylish and fashionable, on such a car it is not a shame to park near some Bentley or at least a Maybach. In general, the car impressed me. Maybe I just think so, simply because this is my first crossover. But this is my objective opinion, the wheelbarrow suits in all respects. With a 2.0 engine and an automatic transmission, it consumes 12 liters / 100 km.
• Alexander, Nizhny Novgorod region. I bought Renault Captyur in the maximum version, with a 2-liter engine and automatic transmission. A great car - beautiful and gambling, consumes 12 liters / 100 km.
• Oleg, Vologda region. The car suits, and for a wheelbarrow for every day it is ideal. The car is economical and consumes an average of 10-12 l / 100 km. Under the hood there is a 2.0 engine and a machine gun.
• Oleg, Yaroslavl. Stylish and solid SUV with a two-liter engine eats 11-12 liters. Comfortable seats with good lateral support and lumbar support. Powerful 2-liter engine - aspirated gasoline. The engine is not new in design, but it impresses due to its high elasticity and exponential traction throughout the entire rev range.

The use of the time-tested "trolley" allowed the novelty to deliberately establish itself as one of the most reliable models on the Russian market. The overall dimensions of Renault Kaptur are only slightly different from the parameters of the body of their fellow donor: the length of the car is 4333 mm, width - 1813 mm, height - 1625 mm, wheelbase - 2673 mm. The wide track (front - 1564 mm, rear - 1570 mm) provides the crossover with the necessary stability, and the impressive ground clearance of 204 mm improves geometric cross-country ability.

One of the two engines of the Renault-Nissan concern is installed in the engine compartment of the car. The base unit is the 1.6-liter H4M four-cylinder unit manufactured at AvtoVAZ facilities. It is tuned to deliver 114 hp. power and 156 Nm of torque. The engine can work in tandem with a 5-speed manual or X-Tronic CVT in front-wheel drive crossover configurations only. The "older" 2.0-liter F4R engine (143 hp, 195 Nm) is already prepared for the all-wheel drive versions of Renault Capture. Available transmission options in this case are 6MKPP and 4-speed "automatic" DP8.

The all-wheel drive SUV is built on the basis of a front-wheel drive layout with a plug-in rear axle. The thrust redistribution function is assigned to the GKN electromagnetic clutch, borrowed from. It can be forcibly blocked.

None of the Kaptur modifications, which is quite predictable, does not shine with dynamic characteristics. The most intense acceleration is provided by a pair of 2.0-liter engine - 6-speed "mechanics". This combination accelerates the car to "hundreds" in 10.5 seconds.

The fuel consumption of Renault Kaptur 1.6 is 7.4 l / 100 km (5MKPP) or 6.9 l / 100 km (variator). A car with a 143-horsepower engine and 4x4 drive saves fuel better when equipped with a manual gearbox. In the combined cycle, this modification consumes about 8.0 liters.

Full technical characteristics of Renault Capture - summary table:

The production of the Renault Captur car was started in 2013, but the model appeared on the domestic market only three years later. Due to its high driving characteristics and extraordinary design, the car quickly gained popularity among various categories of motorists.

The mini crossover is great for daily city commutes and family travel. It remains only to find out what is the fuel consumption for Renault Captur.

Official gas mileage by car

In Eastern Europe, Renault Kaptur is available in versions with 1.6 and 2.0 liter engines. The version with a 1.6 liter engine is equipped with a manual gearbox and an X-Tronic variator. As for the official norms of fuel consumption, the manufacturer has established the following norms in the city / highway mode:

• 1.6 engine paired with manual transmission - 9.3 / 6.3 l;
• 1.6 engine paired with a variator - 8.6 / 6.0 l;
• 2 liter engine paired with manual transmission - 10 / 6.8 liters;
• 2 liter engine paired with automatic transmission - 11.7 / 7.5 liters;

The power of the 1.6-liter engine is 114 forces, which allows the car to accelerate to the first hundred in 12 seconds. Renault Captur with a two-liter engine comes with a 4x4 wheel arrangement. The car has a capacity of 144 horsepower. At the same time, it is worth noting the good speed characteristics of the crossover - the maximum modification speed is 185 km / h.

Fuel consumption 1.6 liter modification

The version with a variator comes out somewhat more economical in terms of the level of gasoline consumption, both in urban and suburban conditions, than in a complete set with a manual gearbox. Reviews of car owners will help you figure out what the "appetite" really is with a 1.6 engine:

1. Stanislav, Yekaterinburg. What thrilled me when I first saw this car was the exterior. I am convinced that this car will stand out from other vehicles for many years to come. But Kaptur is not only good in appearance - it has comfort and dynamics. As for the cost of buying gasoline - it takes 9 liters in the city, 6 liters on the highway. The machine is equipped with a mechanic.
2. Egor, Moscow. I have a Renault Kaptur in the top-end configuration. The car is lightweight, manageable, stable. I use it for daily trips around Moscow. There has never been such a thing that I thought about changing the "iron horse". Consumption is completely satisfied - up to 9 liters in summer and up to 10 liters during cold weather.
3. Maxim, Voronezh. For a long time I dreamed of a good car. For myself, I immediately noticed Renault. Took part in a test drive and Kaptur. Liked more than the second. Modern electronics, high-quality assembly - that's what attracted me to this car. Gasoline consumption of Renault Kaptur is quite adequate - in the configuration with mechanics it leaves an average of 9 liters in the city and 6 liters outside the city.

Renault Kaptur is distinguished by a high level of dynamics and high-quality assembly. Most crossover owners speak positively about the driving characteristics of the car and the level of gasoline consumption that meets the established norm.

Gasoline consumption level Renault Kaptur 2.0

With the release of the Renault Kaptur 4 × 4, the transmission available to choose from has also changed. Instead of a variator, the manufacturer offered a 4-speed automatic, and the manual transmission became a 6-speed one. The owners of the modification note the following indicators of the "appetite" of the crossover:

1. Vyacheslav, Murmansk. I have a Kaptur in the latest configuration with a manual transmission. I will not paint a lot, in short - the car is of high quality for my money, but I would put another gearbox. This one slows down a lot, especially during overclocking. Fires 10 liters of fuel in the city. There were no large overruns.
2. Sergey, Saratov. Moved to a new mini-crossover from Renault Duster. I was hooked on the design and the cozy interior. It behaves steadily on an icy road, on the highway you can overtake and not worry about the amount of gasoline consumed. Outside the city, it takes about 7 liters with a gun. In Saratov, 10 liters per 100 km in summer and up to 11 liters in winter.
3. Yuri, Stavropol. Most recently, I purchased this crossover with a 2.0 engine and mechanics. After the end of the running-in period, the "appetite" of the car returned to normal and today does not exceed 10 liters. If you drive carefully and service your car on time, you can significantly reduce consumption. In the extra-urban cycle 6-6.5 liters, which is fully consistent with the norm.

The modification with a two-liter engine is also economical and does not exceed the limits set by the manufacturer.

All motorists who buy Renault Kaptur are interested in its fuel consumption. This car can be afforded by people with an average income who have not yet forgotten how to count their money. Therefore, fuel consumption per 100 km is an important indicator for buying a vehicle from Renault.

While other manufacturers are only striving for economy, the French brand is already achieving its first tangible results. Renault Kaptur and its gas mileage are in line with the manufacturer's claims.

Many motorists have even managed to achieve even better results in their own tests. There is no doubt about the efficiency of this vehicle. The popularity on our roads is easy to explain based on economic benefits, which has always been a priority for the citizens of the CIS.

What is the fuel consumption of Renault Kaptur according to the passport? The French manufacturer, at the design stage Renault Kaptur, decided to rely on efficiency. The engineers began to carry out the received command.

The result is quite expected fuel consumption for this class. No one was able to make a revolution, but they managed to fit into the budget of the majority of citizens.

We will consider the real consumption later, but now let's take a look at the official statistics for both types of engine:

• in the city from 8.6 to 11.7 l / 100 km;
• on the highway from 6 to 7.3 l / 100 km;
• combined cycle from 6.9 to 8.9 l / 100 km.

Quite expected results for a modern mini-crossover. All potential buyers of the Renault brand can put up with such an expense.

Particularly pleasing is the mixed cycle indicator, where the figure stopped at less than 7 liters. Considering the presentation of the car in March 2016, there are no complaints in this regard.

Four-wheel drive with a fuel consumption of more than 10 liters against the background of 2017 models is a little upsetting. But do not equate last year's releases with the current developments.

Progress allows you to always improve various indicators, including fuel consumption. There is every reason to believe that after restyling everything will become habitually economical. According to the environmental class, Euro 5 was awarded.

Fuel consumption - driver's opinion and independent tests Everyone knows about the lies coming from the manufacturer about fuel consumption. Rare official figures agree with independent tests. Renault Kaptur, after its release, immediately interested motorists in terms of economy.

Everyone wanted to know the real numbers with a manual transmission, CVT and automatic. After the first tests, it became clear that it would be easy to achieve the results announced by Renault.

There is information about lower fuel consumption figures. There is no need to talk about regularity here. Everyone drives a car according to their views and preferences. Therefore, you still need to be able to underestimate fuel consumption, but that this is probably no longer in doubt.

1. The fuel consumption of Renault Kaptur with a 1.6 liter engine on mechanics can be 6 liters per hundred kilometers. Official figures say about 6.3 liters. There are no tangible savings, but the results are still encouraging.
2. With the same engine, a consumption of 9.3 liters was declared in the city. The car owners managed to reduce the figure to 8.6 liters. Here the discrepancy in the data is striking. It is difficult to understand the principle of such a pattern.
3. Renault Kaptur with 2 liters and an automatic machine consumes almost a liter less fuel in the urban cycle. Independent tests set real readings at 10.8 liters, while the French brand points to 11.7 liters / 100 km.
4. In Eco mode, under ideal weather conditions, many noted savings of up to 12%. The engineers managed to achieve tangible results from switching driving modes. This is useful for those drivers who are going to go to another city. The unchanged 52 liter tank will now consume significantly more slowly.

All tests were carried out in roughly realistic conditions. Fuel was familiar to our regions 95. There is no reason to doubt its purity, since cars were mostly refueled at time-tested gas stations.

Naturally, if the gasoline is poured below the level and of poor quality, the fuel consumption will exceed the figures even from the Renault company.

Therefore, you can meet skeptics who are ready to refute the economy of the Frenchman, but still most of the reviews indicate low fuel consumption. We turn to reviews from motorists The data described above are found in every review about Renault Kaptur.

Almost all motorists managed to achieve fuel consumption below the stated indicators. It is believed that the official data was obtained in the most unfavorable places for crossovers. On an ideal road without a pedal to the floor, the economy of the car is fully justified. The machine consumes fuel within the bounds of decency.

For a 4-speed gearbox, the car drives adequately, but it is difficult to call it ideal. There is no sharpness in transitions, and the dynamics noticeably sags. However, in the conditions of the CIS roads, it is not possible to accelerate strongly. Therefore, it will be considered the main advantage of the machine.

Here is the data from one car owner. Traveling in the direction of Kazan-Chelyabinsk-Yekaterinburg with a fully loaded car and air conditioning turned on, the consumption readings were 8.7 l / 100 km.

We also take into account the passengers: two adults and the same number of children. According to the car owner, the average speed was 110 km / h. It follows from this that under load the Renault Kaptur still shows the best results in terms of economy.

Conclusions on fuel consumption Renault Kaptur The car, with all its dimensions, remains one of the most economical in its class. The declared fuel consumption remains conditional, since many manage to exceed these indicators. Sometimes the data diverge up to 1 l / 100 km.

Renault Kaptur with an average consumption of 7 to 8 liters is suitable for most car owners who dream of saving on fuel purchases or increasing the travel distance at one gas station.

Similar materials.

.
Asks: Dmitry Vernik.
Essence of the question: I am interested in the fuel consumption of the new Kaptur, is it very different from the factory standards?

Driving a car in a mixed cycle

Speed \u200b\u200bis the main factor. It is brought to the specified values \u200b\u200band kept for a certain time. All cars are tested at the test site, but not on the highway and not in the city. In general, the mixed cycle is more like a track cycle.

The speed mode, that is, the testing methodology, is determined by each manufacturer himself. And the numbers in the booklets are needed to compare the trim levels.

Passport values

Renault uses the same methodology to test new products, regardless of whether it is in Russia or in Europe. According to this technique, for Renault Kaptur, gasoline consumption is obtained as follows:

• 2.0, 6MKP, 4 × 4: 10.1 / 6.7 / 8.0;
• 2.0, automatic transmission, 4 × 4: 11.7 / 7.3 / 8.9;
• 1.6, CVT, 4x2: 8.6 / 6.0 / 6.9;
• 1.6, 5MKP, 4 × 2: 9.3 / 6.3 / 7.4.

The last (third) number is the combined flow rate.

By the way, a regular glitch with "overstatement" has been fixed: during stops / stops, the consumption is not taken into account. This was not the case before (example below).

A short video with an example of overestimated readings on Logan