Advantages:

Moderately noisy, wear-resistant, not a single puncture in 2 years.

Disadvantages:

Not friendly with the track. If you hit it, you will stay there. Even the native (for a loaf) kama does not behave like that. On the Kama I got into a rut, and when you need to - I left. It doesn't work that way on an RV. I thought that with the side lugs on the RV, the track was no big deal. Wrong. It gets washed out quickly.

Comments:

In principle, for that kind of money, quite good tires. Stones, sand, dirt (not only slurry) on the drum. In the black earth I burrow to the very eggs from time to time, nothing, I leave.

Advantages:

Rows well in mud: clay, black earth, sand, if bleed, rides well. Rides until you sit on the bridges, it's worth your money. It took 3 summers and 2 winters, the remainder of the tread was 3 mm., About 90 t.km. Strong, not a single puncture and side cut. You forget about the holes, hernias appeared on the front wheels only for 3 years of ruthless exploitation ...

Disadvantages:

A bit heavy, quickly erased on the asphalt, average noise.

Comments:

I flew into the pits along the axis, withstood everything, checked! I was satisfied! It's definitely worth its money.

Advantages:

Appearance, cross-country ability, the car has grown by 0.8 mm

Disadvantages:

Diesel fuel consumption.

Comments:

Installed on stock Kyron 275/75 / R16 operation 90% asphalt 10% dirt + 1. permeability has become much better! 2. Full turned on less often! 3. the ground clearance has increased (but not much, maximum 1 cm)! 4. the car began to look more harmonious! 5.Is not planning on puddles - 1.the consumption increased (2000 rubles per tank and the maximum on country roads could reach 500 km) 2.the acceleration increased (at first it was very annoying then I got used to it) 3.the speed decreased, on average, became 100-120 km ... I bought it a new one in September 2016 for 7000r per cylinder. when buying, they even tried to dissuade, but could not) tried to ride it in the winter, I liked the fields and forests, but in the city in winter there is definitely NO! I like!

Advantages:

The rowing is excellent (mud, sand, puddles), puddles are not felt, even at a decent speed, just like a country road with a fair amount of dust, it cleans well, jumps out of the rut (and jumps on the curbs just as well if you rub it sideways))) ), soft.

Disadvantages:

At a speed of more than 80, it begins to make a noticeable noise, it is difficult to drive over long distances, then there is a hum in the ears, at a speed of 120 the road control leaves much to be desired, and if you accelerate more than 120 you start to feel like a suicide bomber. When braking hard, the car bounces.)))) (For the first time from surprise prifigela). Heavy (although I can only compare with the highway).

Comments:

Stands on a Chevrolet Niva (R15 75 215 with the steering wheel fully twisted to the side in the arches wipes). She covered about 35-40 thousand km in four seasons. She would not have been demolished if it had not been for the killed alignment (it was like new, but due to the wrong alignment, it was demolished in a week). In my size it is almost impossible to find, and when I bought it, all the stores were filled up with it. I don’t climb into swamps, but four years of confident fishing trip, and far away into the forest, where there are only directions from the roads. On the highway, I pump 2.5 atmospheres, if I lower it to 2.2, it goes much harder. Compared with winter tires, the difference in acceleration on asphalt is noticeable, on kumho it is noticeably harder. I am very pleased with the rubber.

Advantages:

2.5 years without punctures and repairs, LT model with reinforced sidewall. While the new one does not make much noise and rides tolerably through the mud.

Disadvantages:

The cross-country ability of a car in mud, (namely in mud, and not on soggy primers) quickly sharpens on the asphalt and starts to make noise.

Comments:

I will not say about the behavior on the asphalt and the fuel consumption, it is of little interest to me, and I don’t even remember how the car behaved on road tires. I am writing for those who plan to use tires for their intended purpose - off-road, since I use the car myself exclusively for weekend rides. Average mileage for an exit is 200-300 km, of which 20-40 km. the rest is asphalt. For various primers, it may not be bad, but in the real dirt of Moscow and neighboring regions it drives mediocre, so that it drives acceptable, you have to bleed off up to 0.5 atm, and at this pressure there is a risk of taking off your shoes. With wear and tear, the permeability drops sharply, and the noise increases. It practically does not leave the track, there are no side lugs, this is visually visible. Like MT, rubber is rather weak. For ~ 25 thousand km, the remainder of the tread is 7-9 mm, it’s already dumb to drive off the road, the cross-country ability has become like that of a weak AT.

Advantages:

Passability Silent

Disadvantages:

It is better to entrust the installation to the pros

Advantages:

1. Good choice of sizes on R 15 and 16. 2. Quiet on asphalt 3. Strong

Disadvantages:

1. It is quickly erased, unlike the same BFG or Cooper. 2. Severe 3.

Comments:

I bought it in the amount of 245/75/16 for the stock "Patriot" in April of this year, though it cost me 2 times cheaper then (5880 rubles per bottle) than it costs now. I chose between this and BFG KM2, the choice fell in the direction of KL. Mainly due to the price, it is significantly cheaper. Rows well in the mud (here, of course, depending on what to compare with, it is almost 30 km to the village on a broken dirt road, after rain on bald tires it is impossible to drive at all). On the asphalt, of course, it is erased quickly, on the front end it has probably already worn about 5mm (from April to December). I think it will last 1.5 years, and then everything will be erased. It is better not to drive it on asphalt. The money that is asked for her now is not worth it!

Advantages:

Rows very well, is quite stable on the road, does not feel puddles at speed, gently walks along potholes))

Disadvantages:

Very heavy, noisy !, there is something to compare from MT,

Comments:

The second MT rubber, on my MPS2, what I want to say, this rubber is not for long trips, it is heavy, fuel consumption increases several times, it seemed to me hard on it, when compared with the hankuk MT-noise, like in an airplane, despite the fact that I have additional noise, the previous rubber I had was HankukMT, and so it did not make any noise at all, I drove it on it and on the sea across the sands and to Astrakhan, I did not feel much heaviness, and with this one I even got a little upset ((, but otherwise everything is fine , on mud, it's just super and clay and getting out of the cli is all super.On wet asphalt it goes very confidently and steadily, skated somewhere 6 thousand, I plan to change it, it's very hard with her over long distances ((

Advantages:

Quiet, reasonable price, evil drawing.

Disadvantages:

Rows normally only if it is baited less than 1

Comments:

Stands on lifted Shnivy 235/75/15. I operate it everywhere, from commuting to preparing tracks for competitions. Most of all, the rubber is suitable for expeditions, as it is very quiet and can row well in light off-road. But all the same, you definitely need to poison at least up to 0.8 (but here it is already easy to take off your shoes). Otherwise, he does not want to go, let alone get out of the rut. For real shit ... it is not suitable, after all, it is more AT than MT. In the spring, I will take more suitable for off-road and in a larger size. And I'll leave this one for expeditions and pokatushki, this is her element

Advantages:

It behaves confidently and predictably on any type of surface, except for pure ice, not noisy, soft, in mud and snow it is better not to try to "taxi", but to let the tires do their job and only slightly adjust the direction, tested on a wet potato field, in a swamp (bog) did not climb, but crawls out of the mud "above" the hub without any problems.

The Kumho company has been around for quite some time, but it has only recently begun to gain immense popularity. In its assortment you can find tires for any car and various equipment.

The success of the company largely depends on its goals - the manufacturer always monitors the quality of its products and constantly improves it, without trying to produce the maximum number of tires. Thus, without even thinking about it, the company provided worthy competition to others.

Description of rubber Kumho Road Venture MT KL71

This tire model is designed for crossovers and SUVs in any season of the year. Tires have excellent performance in city and highway driving, but their main purpose is off-road. They also cope with this.

This grip and cross-country ability was achieved mainly due to the tread pattern of the Kumho Road Venture MT KL71 tires. It is directed and presented in multiple layers. The tread is reinforced and therefore less prone to hernias and incisions. Underneath is a belt layer that is made using steel. While driving, it allows you to better work out blows, and also suppresses extraneous noise.

The main mission of the belt layer is to ensure the strength and rigidity of the structure.

Kumho Road Venture MT KL71 Tread Tread

A lot of attention was paid to the tread pattern during the development of this model. It significantly improves traction on any type of road. Excellent permeability to the Kumho Road Venture MT KL71 tires is provided by the side of the tread, on which the lugs are located. They provide excellent handling during sharp maneuvers and cornering.

There is also a drainage system. It includes extra wide grooves. Moisture and snow pass through them, which is then removed from the surface of the Kumho Road Venture MT KL71 R16 tires. They also prevent stones from entering and getting stuck in the tread.

The side part of the tires, which has a belt layer, was also additionally reinforced. Thanks to him, the appearance of damage is practically excluded.

Features:

These tires have several features when compared with other models, namely:

Kumho Road Venture MT KL71 tires are suitable for driving on asphalt surfaces, but their full potential will be revealed only when driving off-road.

The composition of the rubber compound has been changed so that the tires are able to maintain their properties and remain elastic over a huge temperature range. An additional belt layer significantly improves tire wear resistance.

The belt layer also improves impact response when riding on uneven surfaces.

The tread pattern significantly affects the grip properties, especially off-road.

Blocks are located in the central part of the tread, which improve directional stability.

In the lateral part, the blocks are responsible for handling when making sharp maneuvers and cornering.

From damage and the appearance of hernias, cuts, tires are protected by a belt layer made with steel and additional layers of rubber.

The side part of the tires is made without the use of seams, so when driving at high speed on uneven roads, the amount of vibration is minimal.

The drainage system is represented by grooves of various sizes and lengths. The main part of them is increased in width, due to which a very quick drainage of water, snow and mud is ensured.

Finally

Of course, these tires are not suitable for every motorist. However, in certain circles, this model is very popular, because it has excellent off-road performance. Reviews of the Kumho Road Venture MT KL71 are also very positive. This rubber is loved by motorists for its quality and reliability.

One of the brightest representatives of high performance tires. The sporty-aggressive tread pattern was developed using computer simulations and contributes to high resistance to mechanical damage, including at high off-road speeds. The steel breaker is located inside the interlayer, its task is to reduce noise and increase damping qualities.

Positive qualities of the Kumho Road Venture MT KL71

With a unique carcass structure, the brand has managed to achieve the optimal combination of ride comfort and durability. In addition, the Kumho Road Venture MT KL71 has a number of other advantages:

• Due to the elaborated carcass, the tire shape is maintained regardless of the load and driving conditions.
• The center blocks of the tread are self-locking, which improves traction.
• Only this model has additional claw-like hooks on the sides. With their help, the car confidently enters even a sharp turn and at the same time they perform the function of self-cleaning from shallow soil, water, and dirt.
• Additional cleaning of the wheel is made possible by the unique arrangement of the drain grooves.

The sidewalls are reinforced with the innovative ESCOT technology, which dampens vibrations at high speed.

Kumho Road Venture MT KL71 Custom

Kumho Road Venture MT KL71 in Moscow is an all-season rubber that you can easily order yourself through the purchase form or by phone call. For each order placed on the site, bonus points are awarded, for which you can get a discount for the next purchases. Ready-made sets of wheels, disks and accessories are valid promotions and profitable sales.

Mud model of the middle price category. Friends with asphalt, allows you to ride on moderate off-road. Take a closer look if you:

• ride a lot in the city and on the track
• if you want to go hunting or fishing freely, have an active rest in nature
• off-road, most often you deal with primers and rocky surfaces
• love comfort
• looking for budget options

tread pattern Kumho Road Venture M / T KL71

Key Features of the Kumho Road Venture M / T KL71 Off-Road Tire

• Tread Type: Directional, Symmetrical, Mud Terrain
• Diameter: R14-R24
• Profile: high, in some standard sizes full
• Speed \u200b\u200bindex: Q (160 km / h)
• Lifting capacity index: 100-110 (690-1750 kg per wheel)
• Grip on wet asphalt: С-F
• Fuel consumption: E-G
• Noise level: 76-78 dB
• Outside diameter: 27-38 inches
• Width: 8.5-15.5 inches
• Drawing depth: 14-16.8mm
• Reinforced XL sidewall: available in some sizes
• Production: South Korea, China

Kumho Road Venture M / T KL71 on a Ford off-road pickup

Feedback from drivers: advantages and disadvantages of Kumho Road Venture MT CL 71

Kumho is not well known in the mud rubber market. In purely off-road parameters, their tires are not yet very competitive with the classic off-road monsters. Nevertheless, the energetic and fast-growing company has something to offer in order to interest Jeepers with more than just words. There are a number of interesting chips and advantages, which we will dwell on in more detail - practice shows that the KL71 definitely deserves attention and can be liked by many, especially considering its price.

Asphalt

Usually harsh mudas are very sad on the pavement. They can ride, but because of large checkers and vibration it will not be very comfortable even on a perfectly flat track. Advanced manufacturers come up with various tricks, but top-end products, where this issue is resolved, are very expensive. Simpler models, as a rule, are sharpened off-road, the quality of driving on an asphalt road is rarely a priority for anyone. With the KL71 differently, this model adopts the traditional properties of Kumho rubber - softness, silence and elasticity.

Let's say right away - don't expect street-racing properties and perfect noiselessness here, because it's still a Mud Terrain. However, we can say for sure that the acoustic load with this shoe will be significantly lower than that of most types of mud rubber. Bumps are well extinguished, holes are easily passed, a dead road on a remote periphery does not create problems. Long runs on highways and everyday driving in the city will not shake the interior and will not provoke a headache from sound overload, which will definitely appeal to those who have no desire to buy separate wheels for outings, who ride on the same rubber in their everyday life, and on vacation. In addition, asphalt comfort will not be superfluous if you get far to wild places.

Driving properties, when compared with other mudas, are average, but quite decent. The steering wheel is informative, the road is felt, there is a hook, but sharp maneuvers are contraindicated, there can be problems with obedience to a heavy car. On dry roads there may be slippage - keep your distance, do not step on the accelerator more often than necessary. With a wet road, it is normal in terms of hitching, but on puddles, there will be aquaplaning, starting from about 80-90 km / h.

Priming

Calmly rides on any dirt road, including muddy soil with potholes and bumps. The ride is relatively comfortable, the softness of the rubber compensates for the shaking. Pulls well uphill, adequately on wet grass. Forest trails and fields are available in all weather conditions. Sand - you can ride, but be careful not to bury yourself with the accelerator.

Kumho Road Venture M / T KL71 off-road

Stones and rocks

Grips well, paddles on gravel, rides on rocky terrain without problems. Small stones do not get stuck. Mountain roads with dense rocky soil are overcome without the slightest effort.

Clay and mud

Light to moderate dirt will not present any particular problem if it is liquid enough and there is a dense bottom. Difficulties with self-cleaning will be on clay and in deep bays with a viscous liquid.

The KL71 is fine if you do not consider mud as a separate off-road discipline and all you need is the ability to drive where an unpleasant and dangerous puddle in terms of getting stuck blocked the road. If you need any special benefits on the head, look for more themed tires.

Remember that you need to drive vnatyag through mud, in a low gear, so as not to bury yourself. It is better to lower the pressure in the tires, but after returning to a solid surface, pump it back up - the KL71 is not adapted to long-term driving with flat tires, there is a risk of disassembly.

Snow, ice

Closer to zero, KL71 hardens and begins to lose its beneficial properties. Some performance will be retained on snow and porridge due to the sparseness of the tread and the ability to self-clean, but the tires will slip on ice and packed snow. On the asphalt, controllability will fall, braking will become more difficult. It makes sense to use this model all year round closer to southern latitudes, where ice is rare. In all other cases, it is better to buy winter tires for the winter.

Additional nuances

• satisfactory strength - worse than the leaders in the mud segment, but much better than MT tires of the same softness
• wear resistance below average
• Road Venture M / T KL71 is a fairly popular model among owners of domestic cars

Mud rubber Kumho Road Venture MT CL 71: description from the manufacturer, technology

Picture

Sharp polygonal blocks form an abundance of effective grip points. The massiveness of the pattern elements protects the tire from punctures. The lugs, passing to the side surface, improve the permeability on viscous and loose substrates and protect from side cuts. The checkerboard layout and eccentricity of the checkers increase traction on rocks and uneven asphalt. At the bottom of the shoulder area grooves there are stone removers, which protect the protector from pebbles getting stuck between the blocks.

Structure

The two-layer cord stabilizes the tire structure and increases its strength. The steel belt takes the brunt of the shock and improves puncture immunity. There is a damping layer between the belt and the treadmill, which dampens vibrations and improves cabin comfort. The softness of the rubber and the absence of overheating due to the optimization of heat distribution help to reduce contact noise when driving.

Advantages:

Moderately noisy, wear-resistant, not a single puncture in 2 years.

Disadvantages:

Not friendly with the track. If you hit it, you will stay there. Even the native (for a loaf) kama does not behave like that. On the Kama I got into a rut, and when you need to - I left. It doesn't work that way on an RV. I thought that with the side lugs on the RV, the track was no big deal. Wrong. It gets washed out quickly.

Comments:

In principle, for that kind of money, quite good tires. Stones, sand, dirt (not only slurry) on the drum. In the black earth I burrow to the very eggs from time to time, nothing, I leave.

Advantages:

Rows well in mud: clay, black earth, sand, if bleed, rides well. Rides until you sit on the bridges, it's worth your money. It took 3 summers and 2 winters, the remainder of the tread was 3 mm., About 90 t.km. Strong, not a single puncture and side cut. You forget about the holes, hernias appeared on the front wheels only for 3 years of ruthless exploitation ...

Disadvantages:

A bit heavy, quickly erased on the asphalt, average noise.

Comments:

I flew into the pits along the axis, withstood everything, checked! I was satisfied! It's definitely worth its money.

Advantages:

Appearance, cross-country ability, the car has grown by 0.8 mm

Disadvantages:

Diesel fuel consumption.

Comments:

Installed on stock Kyron 275/75 / R16 operation 90% asphalt 10% dirt + 1. permeability has become much better! 2. Full turned on less often! 3. the ground clearance has increased (but not much, maximum 1 cm)! 4. the car began to look more harmonious! 5.Is not planning on puddles - 1.the consumption increased (2000 rubles per tank and the maximum on country roads could reach 500 km) 2.the acceleration increased (at first it was very annoying then I got used to it) 3.the speed decreased, on average, became 100-120 km ... I bought it a new one in September 2016 for 7000r per cylinder. when buying, they even tried to dissuade, but could not) tried to ride it in the winter, I liked the fields and forests, but in the city in winter there is definitely NO! I like!

Advantages:

The rowing is excellent (mud, sand, puddles), puddles are not felt, even at a decent speed, just like a country road with a fair amount of dust, it cleans well, jumps out of the rut (and jumps on the curbs just as well if you rub it sideways))) ), soft.

Disadvantages:

At a speed of more than 80, it begins to make a noticeable noise, it is difficult to drive over long distances, then there is a hum in the ears, at a speed of 120 the road control leaves much to be desired, and if you accelerate more than 120 you start to feel like a suicide bomber. When braking hard, the car bounces.)))) (For the first time from surprise prifigela). Heavy (although I can only compare with the highway).

Comments:

Stands on a Chevrolet Niva (R15 75 215 with the steering wheel fully twisted to the side in the arches wipes). She covered about 35-40 thousand km in four seasons. She would not have been demolished if it had not been for the killed alignment (it was like new, but due to the wrong alignment, it was demolished in a week). In my size it is almost impossible to find, and when I bought it, all the stores were filled up with it. I don’t climb into swamps, but four years of confident fishing trip, and far away into the forest, where there are only directions from the roads. On the highway, I pump 2.5 atmospheres, if I lower it to 2.2, it goes much harder. Compared with winter tires, the difference in acceleration on asphalt is noticeable, on kumho it is noticeably harder. I am very pleased with the rubber.

Advantages:

2.5 years without punctures and repairs, LT model with reinforced sidewall. While the new one does not make much noise and rides tolerably through the mud.

Disadvantages:

The cross-country ability of a car in mud, (namely in mud, and not on soggy primers) quickly sharpens on the asphalt and starts to make noise.

Comments:

I will not say about the behavior on the asphalt and the fuel consumption, it is of little interest to me, and I don’t even remember how the car behaved on road tires. I am writing for those who plan to use tires for their intended purpose - off-road, since I use the car myself exclusively for weekend rides. Average mileage for an exit is 200-300 km, of which 20-40 km. the rest is asphalt. For various primers, it may not be bad, but in the real dirt of Moscow and neighboring regions it drives mediocre, so that it drives acceptable, you have to bleed off up to 0.5 atm, and at this pressure there is a risk of taking off your shoes. With wear and tear, the permeability drops sharply, and the noise increases. It practically does not leave the track, there are no side lugs, this is visually visible. Like MT, rubber is rather weak. For ~ 25 thousand km, the remainder of the tread is 7-9 mm, it’s already dumb to drive off the road, the cross-country ability has become like that of a weak AT.

Advantages:

Passability Silent

Disadvantages:

It is better to entrust the installation to the pros

Advantages:

1. Good choice of sizes on R 15 and 16. 2. Quiet on asphalt 3. Strong

Disadvantages:

1. It is quickly erased, unlike the same BFG or Cooper. 2. Severe 3.

Comments:

I bought it in the amount of 245/75/16 for the stock "Patriot" in April of this year, though it cost me 2 times cheaper then (5880 rubles per bottle) than it costs now. I chose between this and BFG KM2, the choice fell in the direction of KL. Mainly due to the price, it is significantly cheaper. Rows well in the mud (here, of course, depending on what to compare with, it is almost 30 km to the village on a broken dirt road, after rain on bald tires it is impossible to drive at all). On the asphalt, of course, it is erased quickly, on the front end it has probably already worn about 5mm (from April to December). I think it will last 1.5 years, and then everything will be erased. It is better not to drive it on asphalt. The money that is asked for her now is not worth it!

Advantages:

Rows very well, is quite stable on the road, does not feel puddles at speed, gently walks along potholes))

Disadvantages:

Very heavy, noisy !, there is something to compare from MT,

Comments:

The second MT rubber, on my MPS2, what I want to say, this rubber is not for long trips, it is heavy, fuel consumption increases several times, it seemed to me hard on it, when compared with the hankuk MT-noise, like in an airplane, despite the fact that I have additional noise, the previous rubber I had was HankukMT, and so it did not make any noise at all, I drove it on it and on the sea across the sands and to Astrakhan, I did not feel much heaviness, and with this one I even got a little upset ((, but otherwise everything is fine , on mud, it's just super and clay and getting out of the cli is all super.On wet asphalt it goes very confidently and steadily, skated somewhere 6 thousand, I plan to change it, it's very hard with her over long distances ((

Advantages:

Quiet, reasonable price, evil drawing.

Disadvantages:

Rows normally only if it is baited less than 1

Comments:

Stands on lifted Shnivy 235/75/15. I operate it everywhere, from commuting to preparing tracks for competitions. Most of all, the rubber is suitable for expeditions, as it is very quiet and can row well in light off-road. But all the same, you definitely need to poison at least up to 0.8 (but here it is already easy to take off your shoes). Otherwise, he does not want to go, let alone get out of the rut. For real shit ... it is not suitable, after all, it is more AT than MT. In the spring, I will take more suitable for off-road and in a larger size. And I'll leave this one for expeditions and pokatushki, this is her element

Advantages:

It behaves confidently and predictably on any type of surface, except for pure ice, not noisy, soft, in mud and snow it is better not to try to "taxi", but to let the tires do their job and only slightly adjust the direction, tested on a wet potato field, in a swamp (bog) did not climb, but crawls out of the mud "above" the hub without any problems.

Disadvantages:

when braking sharply from a speed above 80 km / h, it prowls, but you can hold it without problems

Comments:

car - Patriot 2014, without OFFROAD tuning

ROAD VENTURE MT KL71 all-season tire from Kumho, made for large SUVs. The tires are positioned as versatile and are well suited for driving on any road surface and temperature.

ROAD VENTURE MT KL71 all-season tire from Kumho, made for large SUVs. The tires are positioned as versatile and are well suited for driving on any road surface and temperature. A rigid center rib with a zig-zag tread pattern provides excellent handling and quick steering response. A special deep pattern maximally prevents clogging of the tread and its fast self-cleaning. The Kumho ROAD VENTURE MT KL71 tires look very impressive and are perfect as a tuning element for a large SUV. The drainage tubules are excellent at draining water away from the point of contact. You can buy ROAD VENTURE MT KL71 tires in the Euro Disks store at a low price.

★★★★ good model

Advantages:

Moderately noisy, wear-resistant, not a single puncture in 2 years.

Disadvantages:

Not friendly with the track. If you hit it, you will stay there. Even the native (for a loaf) kama does not behave like that. On the Kama I got into a rut, and when you need to - I left. It doesn't work that way on an RV. I thought that with the side lugs on the RV, the track was no big deal. Wrong. It gets washed out quickly.

Comment:

In principle, for that kind of money, quite good tires. Stones, sand, dirt (not only slurry) on the drum. In the black earth I burrow to the very eggs from time to time, nothing, I leave.

★★★★ good model Experience of use: Several years

Advantages:

Rows well in mud: clay, black earth, sand, if bleed, rides well. Rides until you sit on the bridges, it's worth your money. It took 3 summers and 2 winters, the remainder of the tread was 3 mm., About 90 t.km. Strong, not a single puncture and side cut. You forget about the holes, hernias appeared on the front wheels only for 3 years of ruthless exploitation ...

Disadvantages:

A bit heavy, quickly erased on the asphalt, average noise.

Comment:

I flew into the pits along the axis, withstood everything, checked! I was satisfied! It's definitely worth its money.

★★★★★ great model Experience of use: Several months

Advantages:

Appearance, cross-country ability, the car has grown by 0.8 mm

Disadvantages:

Diesel fuel consumption.

Comment:

Installed on stock Kyron 275/75 / R16 operation 90% asphalt 10% dirt + 1. permeability has become much better! 2. Full turned on less often! 3. the ground clearance has increased (but not much, maximum 1 cm)! 4. the car began to look more harmonious! 5.Is not planning on puddles - 1.the consumption increased (2000 rubles per tank and the maximum on country roads could reach 500 km) 2.the acceleration increased (at first it was very annoying then I got used to it) 3.the speed decreased, on average, became 100-120 km ... I bought it a new one in September 2016 for 7000r per cylinder. when buying, they even tried to dissuade, but could not) tried to ride it in the winter, I liked the fields and forests, but in the city in winter there is definitely NO! I like!

★★★★★ great model Experience of use: Several years

Advantages:

The rowing is excellent (mud, sand, puddles), puddles are not felt, even at a decent speed, just like a country road with a fair amount of dust, it cleans well, jumps out of the rut (and jumps on the curbs just as well if you rub it sideways))) ), soft.

Disadvantages:

At a speed of more than 80, it begins to make a noticeable noise, it is difficult to drive over long distances, then there is a hum in the ears, at a speed of 120 the road control leaves much to be desired, and if you accelerate more than 120 you start to feel like a suicide bomber. When braking hard, the car bounces.)))) (For the first time from surprise prifigela). Heavy (although I can only compare with the highway).

Comment:

Stands on a Chevrolet Niva (R15 75 215 with the steering wheel fully twisted to the side in the arches wipes). She covered about 35-40 thousand km in four seasons. She would not have been demolished if it had not been for the killed alignment (it was like new, but due to the wrong alignment, it was demolished in a week). In my size it is almost impossible to find, and when I bought it, all the stores were filled up with it. I don’t climb into swamps, but four years of confident fishing trip, and far away into the forest, where there are only directions from the roads. On the highway, I pump 2.5 atmospheres, if I lower it to 2.2, it goes much harder. Compared with winter tires, the difference in acceleration on asphalt is noticeable, on kumho it is noticeably harder. I am very pleased with the rubber.