Czech cars have become a worthy option for excellent technology, which has been actively developed in recent years in Russia. German technology and excellent build quality make cars really reliable, attractive, and relevant in the modern world of the not so simple automotive industry. Many companies cannot compete with Czechs due to the very good combination of price and quality of Czech cars. The most popular and promising models in the Skoda Corporation lineup are Octavia and Rapid. The first model has rather deep roots; a car with this name was produced in the middle of the last century. Rapid also existed in the lineup of that time, but today it only has a common name with its deep ancestor.

New generations of cars have made it possible to see the development of the Czech automotive industry. For a moment it seemed that Skoda did not quite understand what to do next with their cars. But in fact, it turned out that the company was simply preparing the release of several high-profile novelties at once. Among the update, the brand new Skoda Rapid first appeared, which took an intermediate position between the Fabia and Octavia. The new Skoda Octavia appeared right after the Rapid. The car has received many important technical and visual changes, it has become objectively better than the previous modifications. The change in this car deserves the title of a new generation, since there were a lot of reforms in the car.

Skoda Octavia - the main advantages and technical features of the car

A fairly large sedan, or rather a liftback, has become a symbol of the Czech brand. The company received maximum sales with minimum investment in brand development. Under the wing of the Volkswagen Group, the Skoda corporation feels more than confident. The cars are simply gorgeous, the transport deserves the best emotions and reviews. Octavia not only turned out to be a good car in the new generation, but also called into question the advisability of buying more expensive equipment from the same VW. For some, the car replaced the idea of \u200b\u200bbuying a Jetta or Golf, for others it became an adequate replacement for the Passat. There are many important technical and other advantages that give the Octavia the following capabilities:

• a chic change of style made the car similar to the modern developments of Volkswagen;
• common styling with Audi-VW takes the Octavia to a whole new level of development and sales;
• engines start at 1.6 MPI without turbine with 110 horsepower, continue at 1.4 TSI with 140 horsepower;
• 1.6 TDI with 105 horsepower fits perfectly into the package, complemented by 2.0 TDI with 143 horsepower;
• 1.8 TSI puts out 180 horsepower and serves for the most powerful series of liftback with amazing performance;
• both simple mechanical versions and DSG robots and traditional automatic machines were used as boxes;
• the dynamics of the trip is felt in the interior of the car, the car responds perfectly to all the driver's actions.

If you want to enjoy the ride and enjoy the freedom of movement, now is the time to get more information about the Skoda Octavia. This car will delight you with its characteristics, make you think about your perception of Czech cars. The build quality of the car is very high. Our country is one of the largest Octavia in terms of supplies, since this model has occupied its rightful first place in the class for several years now. After the update, the cost of the car increased slightly, but the popularity did not decrease. Today you can buy the most democratic versions of Octavia for quite reasonable money - 820,000 rubles.

Skoda Rapid - development for the budget segment

The company released the Rapid in the form of a sedan and a hatchback. At its core, the sedan repeats the features of the Octavia and is also a hatchback or liftback. The car behaves very decently in difficult situations, perfectly manages the difficulties of Russian roads, and provides increased comfort in the cabin for front and rear passengers. If this is your first time sitting on the back sofa Rapid, you will not be able to immediately tell which class the car belongs to. It seems that the car belongs to the segment much higher, but in fact it is a budget B-class. True, in terms of its parameters, the car borders on the C-class in terms of size and comfort. The main technical and functional advantages of Rapid are as follows:

• the base engine is amazing - 1.2 MPI at 75 horsepower, there is also 1.6 MPI at 110 horsepower;
• diesel units are presented only in Europe, 1.6 TDI did not reach Russia;
• 1.4 TSI turbine and 122 horsepower works perfectly paired with an automatic transmission;
• the suspension of the car is very energy-intensive, has excellent technical data and amazing quality;
• the steering is quite sharp, very reminiscent of a sporty ride at high speeds;
• on the track, the trip is as calm as possible for the driver, confident and quite comfortable for all passengers;
• the car does not require intervention in the work of the technical base, everything is done very well.

From the branded gearboxes in the technical arsenal of the Skoda Rapid, both simple mechanical options and excellent automatic machines and successful robotic gearboxes have settled. The car, which costs only 560,000 rubles in the basic configuration, offers excellent ride emotions, the highest level of comfort and excellent technical characteristics. The quite adequate purchase budget makes the Skoda Rapid one of the most reasonable purchases for every buyer. For all its advantages, the car does not impose restrictions on the age or gender of the driver. Auto is completely versatile.

What is better to buy - choose arguments for Octavia or Rapid

The Czech car brand Skoda has created wonderful cars, which sometimes even enter the competition line. If you have about 1,000,000 rubles for the purchase, you can buy an Octavia in fact in the basic configuration, or give preference to the Rapid in full equipment with a huge potential of the power unit and a complete set of an elite car. Such possibilities immediately tip the scales towards Rapid. But these are not all the advantages of the car. Considering two models of Czech production, you can find many important advantages for each of them:

• Octavia beats Rapid in cabin size and seating comfort for each passenger as well as for the driver;
• the large size gives the Octavia the advantage of a more confident ride at high speeds;
• also, the older version has a large number of engines and trim levels available to the buyer;
• visually, Rapid is similar to Octavia, but the older model wins this competition in design;
• in turn, Rapid has the very same German engines with good technology;
• the younger car has a lot of technical advantages, and also provides considerable comfort;
• at the price of Rapid in the basic configuration, it is 1.5 times cheaper than its older brother on the conveyor.

As you can see, both cars are worthy of your attention. Buying any particular model, you can take advantage of the solutions of a European concern with a huge history and excellent patronage. So picking up a car will most likely have to cost. If you have the money to buy a base Octavia, consider purchasing the Rapid in the most complete package. You will get a more powerful and modern engine, great functions on board the car and even some individual additions, unexpected for this budgetary sector of transport from the Czech Republic. We offer you to see a comparative test drive of these wonderful cars of the Czech concern Skoda:

Summing up

There are many criteria that become important when buying a car. For each driver, you can find your own set of requirements for the future car. Of course, there are many options for the characters and preferences of buyers who will select for themselves different cars in various trim levels and with certain factory additions and accessories. Therefore, the choice of a car today is more an individual task than a consequence of receiving recommendations from professionals and experts.

However, many will draw their own conclusions from reading the Skoda Octavia and Rapid reviews. In addition to the information, take advantage of a test drive at a car dealership. So you can get a real understanding of which car suits you best. It is very easy to buy a quality hatchback disguised as a sedan without spending too much money. Would you prefer comas when choosing a car between Skoda Rapid and Soda Octavia?

Sometimes it is difficult to choose between cars that have a lot in common. Which is better? Which to choose? In this article we will try to compare two cars on the same platform and understand which is better - Volkswagen Polo or Skoda Rapid?

Dimensions

At first glance, the Volkswagen Polo in the sedan body looks very similar and their dimensions are identical, but if you make accurate measurements, it turns out that there is a difference. Polo and Rapid dimensions, respectively:

• length - 3970 and 4300 mm;
• width - 1682 and 1706 mm;
• height - 1462 and 1461 mm.

As you can see, the Skoda is larger and in places noticeable, which makes the car heavier.

External appearance

First of all, when choosing a car, the buyer looks at the appearance, and then at the technical characteristics. The exterior of the Volkswagen Polo and Skoda Rapid is different and you can see it with the naked eye. It is impossible to confuse them on the road, but if you look closely, then there are many similarities in the appearance of two cars. For example, the front optics are a bit similar in shape. Both cars are equipped with spoilers with brake lights, making them almost twins at the rear.

The shape of the bumpers also resembles each other. Both cars are equipped with 15-inch rims. Volkswagen is slightly shorter than the Rapid, which makes it look a little more modest. But this is noticeable only if you put the cars next to each other. The body of the "German" is distinguished by more pronounced straight lines and sharpened headlights. In this way, he resembles his sister older models, but the Rapid looks like a mini-version of Octavia. Surely, the Czech designers conceived this.

Let's take a look at the salon

Both cars do not shine with a chic finish. Skoda Rapid or Volkswagen Polo Sedan have low quality fabric, but it is practical because it is difficult to get dirty. Both armchairs and doors are upholstered with this fabric. Immediately striking are the differences in the driver's position. At Skoda, it is clearly higher, albeit slightly. In addition, the seat is height adjustable. The same is with the steering wheel - in Rapid it has adjustments in height and reach, and even in the simplest configuration. The driver's seat is semi-sporty, and the lateral support is great when cornering.

Definitely, Skoda has taken care of the driver's comfort. Thanks to all the available adjustments, it will be convenient for people with tall stature to drive. And in general, adjusting the seat and steering wheel for yourself in the Skoda Rapid will not be difficult. Polo in this regard was created rather for people of average height. Those who are above average growth will suffer on long trips. The Czechs also have a longer base, which gives the rear passengers more legroom. Outwardly, it is imperceptible, but it is enough to sit in the passenger seat to feel the significant advantage of Skoda over Volkswagen.

The Rapid is also a bit wider, but the "German" has a higher ceiling above the rear seats. At first glance, such a comparison between the Skoda Rapid and the Volkswagen Polo Sedan shows that the former wins. But if you put next to the "Czech" with the minimum filling and Polo with the maximum, then the former will seriously yield. Immediately striking is the primitive climate control, the old-model radio, the simplest steering wheel design. But the cost is significantly lower.

Let's open the trunk

Compared to the Polo, the Rapid is presented in a liftback body. That is, outwardly, this is the same sedan, but the rear window rises along with the trunk as if it were the fifth hatchback door. Such a trunk is not without its drawbacks, but often when they see it open, motorists stop noticing them. The volume of 530 liters is expensive! This is compared to just 460 liters for the Polo. Thanks to its shape, the Skoda trunk allows you to load and unload rather bulky luggage with great comfort. Polo is not a competitor here.

But the liftback trunk has disadvantages. Firstly, when you open it in winter, the interior is instantly cooled and it takes a lot of time to warm it up again. The second minus is not so significant - the lid rises very high, and there are places where this simply cannot be done. In any case, these shortcomings are insignificant when the volume of the trunk is announced, because 530 liters is with the standard position of the rear sofa and the installed partition.

Trunks differ not only in volume, but also in equipment. Polo in this regard is simple - the trunk is empty and if there is a desire to make any additional fastenings, then you have to "turn" yourself. Rapid offers an original mesh for attaching some things and tools, which can be easily purchased additionally.

Comparison of dashboards

Here the cars are completely different - the panels differ radically. Moreover, the Skoda Rapid wins significantly: a modern scoreboard with an easy-to-read white font on a dark background. It is very easy, and most importantly, without being distracted from driving, you can monitor fuel consumption, the duration of the distance traveled, the power reserve and other parameters.

Volkswagen Polo is not so happy. The bright red illumination characteristic of VW cars is also here. The on-board computer screen looks outdated, and the information content of the display leaves much to be desired. The information is relevant for the pre-styling model. After 2015, the tidy was changed.

Rapid even has an indicator of the included gear and a hint, which one to switch to - higher or lower. Works both for mechanics and for the machine, and if you follow these tips, you can significantly save gas.

What's under the hood?

The Polo recently underwent a small upgrade, received some new features in the external appearance, thanks to which it began to look a little more presentable, and at the same time the engine line was updated. There are two new models - 90 and 110 hp. both 1.6L available to order. They can be called new with a big stretch, because they were installed in the Rapid even before the VW upgrade. The Skoda Rapid has a clear advantage - the presence of a turbocharged 122-horsepower 1.4 TSI engine. True, Volkswagen has already promised to eliminate this injustice, but the cost of a car with such an engine will already be too high for a budget option.

Driving performance assessment

When choosing between Volkswagen Polo or Skoda Rapid, it should be borne in mind that the second was created on the platform of the first. True, she still received changes. Here, the widening of the track can be seen with the naked eye, and the increase in length. It is thanks to the increase in the width of the base that the Rapid received improved road stability. It also has a reinforced suspension - this is done with an emphasis on the greater mass of the car compared to the Polo.

According to Skoda workers, the suspension of their brainchild is also configured differently. We have to take our word for it. The suspension scheme is identical for both cars, but there are some differences in the components. The Rapid also has a McPherson independent spring suspension in the front, and trailing arms with a V-shaped torsion beam at the rear. This constructive solution made it possible to reduce the cost of the car and increase the free space behind the cabin, but reduced the comfort for the passengers sitting behind. The manual transmission on Skoda was also modified, shortening the lever and making the move smoother. The clutch travel is also shorter and the response is felt earlier.

Volkswagen fans tend to focus on multi-link rear suspension, but the Rapid is not the case. The car turned out to be too budget for such a decision. But you should not rush to conclusions - this did not negatively affect the behavior of the car on the road. On the contrary, the handling is at a height, the car enters the turns perfectly, the exposure of the straight-line movement is very noticeable. The steering wheel obeys great. But both cars have a noticeable drawback - high rigidity. They both ride equally well, but at the slightest unevenness the bouncing will be significant.

It makes sense to compare cars on the road only with the same engines, for example, with 105-horsepower, present in both lines. As a result of the test drive, it turned out that in urban conditions both cars are absolutely equal. The start is abrupt, at over 3,000 rpm the ride is at a high level in both cases. Up to 100 km / h "German" gets in 9.7 seconds, and the competitor for 10.4 - more weight affects. The maximum acceleration is 195 km / h and 190 km / h, respectively. Fuel economy is approximately equal.

conclusions

Both cars are famous for their economical consumption, differ in approximately the same technical characteristics and capabilities on the road. A significant advantage of the Rapid liftback is only in a very voluminous trunk. But this will be a plus only for summer residents, avid fishermen and hunters. Although, for many objective reasons, Skoda Rapid may be preferable. This is a lower cost in the simplest configurations, and cheaper maintenance, a variety of engines, gearboxes, and better thought out sets of additional options.

When choosing which car to buy, Volkswagen Polo or Skoda Rapid, many motorists lean towards the Czech brand only because additional options can be ordered one at a time or in a package. Volkswagen only offers packages, of which there are only 5 to choose from. The rest of the cars are still very similar and the final choice depends on personal preferences and views.

In general, Skoda Rapid is one of the undisputed leaders of its class. Volkswagen attracts the buyer with a more status brand, and in high trim levels it turns out to be somewhat cheaper. Not so long ago, a poll among Russian car owners driving cars of the budget segment showed that Skoda Fabia is in first place in popularity, Polo is in the Second place, but Rapid did not enter this rating at all.

The debate about which is better - Volkswagen Polo or Skoda Rapid can be closed. There is not and never will be a winner. Volkswagen fans will choose it, and fans of the practical Czech car industry will prefer the Skoda. On the road, these cars are equal, inferior or superior to each other only in certain characteristics.

Video

Video of a review and comparative test drive of the Skoda Rapid and Volkswagen Polo sedan.

After the Skoda Rapid was born, many motorists could not understand what class it belonged to. If we take class "B", in which its relative Volkswagen Polo is located, then the car is too big for him, but for the "C" class, in which Volkswagen Golf is the dominant, and of the sisters it is the Skoda Octavia A7 - it is too small. All the fuss turned out because the Rapid is designed on the initially elongated VW Polo platform in the sedan body. Therefore, the base of the Rapid turned out to be even longer than that of the older sister of Octavia A5 - 2602 mm versus 2578 mm. As a result, her class became "B +". Well, for clarity, the difference between the modern Rapid and its sisters Skoda Octavia Tour and Octavia A5, which are C-class cars, but of the older generation, let's give specific comparative sizes in specific numbers.

Comparison of the Rapid saloon with Octavia Tour and A5

First of all, the lengthening of the body had a positive effect on the distance between the back of the front seat and the rear one, for Rapid it is from 170 to 410 mm, and, accordingly, for the Octavia A5 it is 130 mm - 380 mm and the Octavia Tour 140 mm - 380 mm. For example, if a person of average height, this is 174-176 cm, sits behind the wheel and adjusts the front seat for himself, then there will be a distance between the back seat and the back of the front seat: Skoda Rapid has 300 mm, Octavia A5 has 290 mm, and of Round - 260 mm. As for the width of the cabin, according to the characteristics, the width of the Skoda Rapid is 1706 mm, which is 30 mm narrower than the Octavia Tour and 70 mm narrower than the Octavia A5. But if you look from the practical point of view, take, for example, the width of the cabin, which is at the level of the driver's shoulders, then in this place Rapid "inserts" the Tour by 10 mm and loses only 20 mm to the Skoda A5. This was achieved by the designers thanks to the convexity of the doors.

The torpedo on the Skoda Rapid has become more concave in its lower part compared to the Octavia, this gives more legroom for the front passenger, which makes the train more comfortable.

The floor tunnel inherent in all three cars in Rapid has become even smaller and more convenient than that of the older sisters Octavius, so it will be easier to move from one place to another on the back sofa.

Comparison of the size and capacity of the trunk

On all three models, the size of the luggage compartment is almost the same, only a few differences make the Rapid's boot more practical than the Octavias.

Let's start a comparison with the width of the trunk along the arches of the rear wheels - it is the same for everyone and equal to 1010 mm, this despite the fact that Rapid is narrower in external dimensions, but it turned out this way due to the fact that the arches on Rapid are narrower, since standard wheels are used with dimensions 185/60/15, well, for Octavias it is 195/65/15.

Comparison of the distance between the supports, on which the rear shelf rests, showed that for Rapid it is wider and is 965 mm, for Octavia A5 - 920 mm and Octavia Tour - 895 mm. This allows a wider load to be loaded.

The working volume of the Rapid is 550 liters, which is 10 liters less than that of the Octavia A5 and 20 more than that of the Octavia Tour.

If we compare the depth, then the Octavia's trunk is 80 and 60 mm deeper, but from the point of view of the convenience of getting small things, then for Rapid this is only for the best.

And if you bought something heavy, then when loading into Rapid you will have to sweat less, since its loading height is 700 mm, versus 750 for Octavia A5 and 770 for Turka.

Summing up

Well, the fact that the novelty was attributed to a lower class than her sister Octavia did not in any way affect its practicality and comfort. And in many comparative parameters, Rapid even "inserts" them. Therefore, if you compare the cost of used Octavias, which are relatively in good condition, with a completely new Rapid, there will be no difference. The question is - why buy used Octavias? Moreover, Rapid is made according to new methods and technologies and has modern standards for economy and safety of the driver and passengers.

In addition, a table with a large number of different comparative geometric parameters of the three cars:

September 9, 2017

LADA XRAY or Skoda Rapid - compare which is better?

Comparing Lada Iks Rey and Skoda Rapid, you need to carefully approach the issue of engines, gearboxes and trim levels.

The release of the new domestic hatchback Lada Iks Rey on the market did not go unnoticed, especially considering how popular this model has become. Nevertheless, competitors were not asleep and were definitely not going to give their piece of the market pie without a fight. One of the most titled rivals of the Russian car was the Skoda Rapid liftback, which at one time took the place of Octavia, which moved to a more expensive segment.

And this means that the rivalry between the two models is very sharp, especially considering that the prices for cars, although they differ, but not so much (however, this is only at first glance). And therefore, it is imperative to find out which is better - Lada X Rey or Skoda Rapid!

Prestige and size

It is no secret that foreign cars are quoted in Russia higher than domestic models, with the exception, perhaps, of the "Chinese". Nevertheless, the Skoda has always been viewed as a "people's model", which, although not as fashionable as Volkswagen or Audi, is technically not much inferior to them. Naturally, all this has a positive effect on the Skoda Rapid's reputation, raising its status in the eyes of the buyer.

Dimensions X Ray

As for the LADA XRAY, the domestic hatchback, of course, is actively winning the audience's sympathy, but it must be admitted that it has a long road to success ahead. Therefore, the Skoda is still preferable.

Dimensions	LADA XRAY	Skoda Rapid
	4165 mm	4483 mm
Width	1764 mm
	1570 mm	1474 mm
Wheelbase	2592 mm
Front track	1492 mm	1463 mm
Rear track	1532 mm
	195 mm	170 mm
Trunk volume	361 l (1207 l)
	1190 kg (1650 kg)	1470 kg (1565 kg)

Rapid parameters

From a comparison of the dimensions of X Ray and Rapid, it can be seen that the Czech liftback is much longer, but narrower and lower. The wheelbase is about the same, but in terms of ground clearance, the Lada is far ahead - it is 25 mm larger. On the other hand, Skoda puts its competitor on both paddles with the volume of the trunk, which is not surprising, because it is the trunk that has long become the business card of cars from the Czech Republic.

The Rapid trunk is impressive

Exterior

The different body type of both models largely predetermined the different exterior. Therefore, in this regard, everything will depend not only on taste, but also on the preferences of the bodywork range.

The exterior of Lada X Rey will definitely appeal to connoisseurs of aggression in the image. And this is not empty bravado, although, of course, in comparison with the concept, the hatchback does not look so expressive. Particularly impressive are the X-shaped curves on the sidewalls, capturing not only the doors, but also the bumpers and fenders.

The front end, with its merged grille and air intake, edged with chrome moldings, in the same X-shape, looks very profitable and goes well with the headlights. And the stern with a massive black lining on the rear bumper, and a wing on the fifth door, also fits well into the image.

The appearance of the Skoda Rapid, which was updated in 2017, clearly confirms the success of the policy of many auto companies, including Skoda - if you want the model to be in the spotlight again, you should do with minor edits and declare about restyling, which, in fact, is was done.

The updates are small, but they are, and so imperceptible that the restyled Rapid can easily be confused with a richer version. Indeed, how many people will notice the taillights with diodes, updated fog lights and new optics equipped with strips of diode DRLs? But this is where the significant changes in the image of the Czech liftback end.

As you can see, in the question of what to choose, Lada X Rey or Skoda Rapid, you will have to focus only on your own preferences.

Specifications

In this case, it is worth recognizing that Rapid is better than X Ray. The fact is that the superiority of the liftback is evident, both in terms of power units and in terms of gearboxes. However, about everything in more detail ...

Engines

The Rapid has an advantage here, since the motor range of this model is wider. Nevertheless, there are no diesel engines, although Skoda often relied on "solar-powered" units.

The Czech line begins with a budget 1.6-liter aspirated. Its power is very small and is only 90 liters. sec., although they are available at 4250 rpm. However, the thrust of 155 Nm at 3800 rpm helps a little. Thanks to this, the liftback exchanges a hundred in 11.4 seconds, with a limit of 185 km / h, which is not so bad. And the consumption of 7.8 liters in the city is small.

It is followed by the same 1.6-liter 16-valve, but already 110-strong. The peak power of the engine at 5800 rpm, and the same as that of the previous engine, a torque of 155 Nm is achievable at the same 3800 rpm. The increase in power had a beneficial effect on the dynamics, which improved to 10.3 seconds, and the maximum speed, which increased to 195 km / h, while maintaining the consumption of 7.9 liters.

1.4 MPI 110 HP from.

The competitor to this motor was the base engine Lada X Rey, with a volume of 1.6 liters and a capacity of 106 liters. sec., which is combined with a torque of 148 Nm at 4200 rpm. It was created by the engineers of the Russian auto company, having reworked and improved the VAZ-21129 type. It should be admitted that the drawdown in power and torque, compared to the 110-horsepower Czech unit, led to a lag of 1.1 seconds. in acceleration and at 21 km / h at maximum speed - 11.4 sec. and 174 km / h, respectively. And the gasoline consumption is higher - more than 9 liters.

1.6-horsepower X Ray motor

In the top, the Skoda Rapid offers the buyer a very rare unit for the B segment. This is a 1.4-liter turbocharged engine with direct fuel injection. Despite the fact that its volume seems modest, such a motor endows Rapid with an explosive temperament, which is not surprising, from 125 hp. from. and 200 Nm of torque!

Weaving Rapid 1.4 TSI exchanges in just 9 seconds, which is just excellent for class B. And the maximum speed of 208 km / h is almost beyond competition. Cherry on the cake - 7 liters in the city!

1.4 TSI 125 HP from.

Lada X Rey responds with its own top engine. However, unlike the Czech, the hatchback has a simple aspirated engine under the hood, with a volume of 1.8 liters and a return of 122 liters. from. It should be noted that this is a new development of a Russian company. Given the injection layout, the power is quite at the level, as well as the torque of 170 Nm.

However, the absence of a turbine caused a loss in dynamics and maximum speed - 10.4 seconds to hundreds and 185 km / h, respectively. Consumption is also much higher - 9.3 liters. in the town.

122 hp X Ray engine

In general, we must admit that in terms of engines, the Skoda Rapid is better than the Lada X Rey. The engine range of the European model is wider, but its decisive advantage is the presence of a turbocharged unit. On the other hand, the disadvantage of such an engine is its complexity (the presence of a turbine, intercooler, air ducts and other components) and, as a result, more expensive maintenance.

Transmissions

If we consider the topic of which is better - Lada X Rey or Skoda Rapid - in the context of gearboxes, one cannot but recognize the significant advantage of the Czech model.

However, in terms of mechanical transmissions, there is an approximate equality. Both models are equipped with a 5-speed manual transmission. The Russian hatchback has a French box, while the Czech liftback has its own design.

Rapid mechanics

Whatever it was, but there are no complaints about the nodes - the gears are switched on clearly, the short-stroke pleases, there are no departures at all, etc. It should only be noted that the XRAY mechanics are available for any motor, while the Rapid only has paired with 90-horsepower and 110-horsepower aspirated.

MKPP5 Lada

But in terms of automatic transmissions, Skoda has a complete advantage. The fact is that X Ray is equipped only with a 5-speed robot of the AMT type, developed on the basis of the mechanics of the MT 21826 series. The transmission is generally not bad, but there are still delays in switching.

5-band АМТ LADA XRAY

Rapid offers a choice of 2 boxes. The first is a 6-band classic automatic, which is available with a 110-horsepower engine. The quality of his work is beyond doubt - clear switching, quick response to kick-downs, etc.

But there is a better option. It is a 7-band DSG preselective transmission that is paired with a 1.4 TSI. It is not for nothing that DSG is recognized as the best gearbox at the moment! Shifts are instant, impressive efficiency, vigorous dynamics and other advantages.

As you can see, the Czechs did not skimp on gearboxes for their model. But there are also some caveats. X Ray is equipped with a robot, not a conventional machine gun, in order to reduce the price of a car. And yet, the advantage of AMT is its unpretentiousness. Regarding the DSG Skoda, then, with all its advantages, this transmission does not differ in reliability, while repairs, due to the extreme complexity of the unit, are very expensive. In addition, during long driving through traffic jams, the DSG starts to twitch when shifting due to overheating.

Chassis

Unlike transmissions, the Lada Iks Rey and Skoda Rapid's suspension is structurally the same. No modification has a completely independent multi-link circuit. Both machines are equipped with a semi-independent chassis, with a torsion beam on the rear axle. In general, competitors have no problems with handling.

But the character is slightly different. The LADA XRAY suspension stands out for its energy consumption, thanks to which you can roll even on bumpy roads without worrying too much, because you still need to try to break through the struts! And you completely forget about small irregularities on the Russian hatchback. However, there is also a minus - it rolls in corners. Yes, the chassis is well tuned, but the height of the car and considerable ground clearance do their job.

Skoda Rapid is generally more reckless, and the owners do not complain about excessive rigidity. However, this is only true for the 1.6-liter versions. The 1.4 TSI engine is quite heavy, plus the DSG's weight takes its toll. As a result, driving on such a modification is noticeably tougher, although you cannot call it an "oak" car.

In terms of cross-country ability, X Ray is better than Rapid, and significantly! After all, not every SUV has a clearance of 195 mm. In addition, the switchable ESС system helps a lot - with it, the domestic hatchback easily leaves places where the Rapid cannot go at all. Naturally, with all-wheel drive, XRAY's capabilities would be much greater, but even with ESC, the Lada's advantage is obvious.

And in the plot of "Okay mechanics" representatives of AvtoVAZ clearly showed everything that the hatchback is capable of outside the asphalt.

Interior

Within competitors, a completely different approach to style can be traced. That is why it will not be easy to determine the winner between Lada X Rey and Skoda Rapid in this round.

The XRAY salon is designed to match the exterior. The seats are very decent for their segment, with the exception of basic trim levels, where the lumbar support is too low. In addition, plastic is of different texture, which, although it does not affect comfort, is not to the liking of all car owners.

The dashboard sports beautiful wells and lighting. A large screen is located on the center console, and the elongated air vents look very good. In general, the interior of the hatchback is tailored for active driving.

The approach of the Czechs is completely different and, for them, traditional. The Rapid interior is strict and correct, to some extent even pedantic. Unsurprisingly, he has both ardent fans and opponents who believe that the interior is too boring.

Yes, inside the liftback you feel like in an office, where the only thing missing is a table lamp and a secretary. On the other hand, many people like quality materials and impeccable ergonomics. The seats are good, but there are optional seats with integrated headrests.

Options and prices

LADA XRAY offers customers 3 configurations - Optima, Luxe and Exclusive. Skoda Rapid also has 3 versions - Entry / Active, Ambition, Style. The price of the Lada X Rey is lower than that of the Skoda Rapid. In the database, it starts from 599,900 rubles against 611,000 rubles for Rapid. In the maximum configuration, the difference is much more significant - 830,900 rubles for Lada and 956,400 rubles for Skoda.

LADA X REY

Equipment	Specifications	Price, rub.)
	1.6 l 16-cl. (106 hp), 5MT	629 900
Optima / Air conditioner	1.6 l 16-cl. (106 hp), 5MT
	1.6 l 16-cl. (106 hp), 5MT	690 900
Optima / Air conditioner
Optima / Air conditioner	1.8 l 16-cl. (122 hp), 5MT	739 900
Luxe	1.6 l 16-cl. (106 hp), 5MT
	1.8 l 16-cl. (122 hp), 5AMT	740 900
Luxe / Prestige	1.6 l 16-cl. (106 hp), 5MT
	1.8 l 16-cl. (122 hp), 5MT	775 900
Luxe	1.8 l 16-cl. (122 hp), 5AMT
	1.8 l 16-cl. (122 hp), 5MT	825 900
Luxe / Prestige	1.8 l 16-cl. (122 hp), 5AMT
	1.8 l 16-cl. (122 hp), 5AMT	860 900
Luxe / Prestige	1.8 l 16-cl. (122 hp), 5MT
	1.8 l 16-cl. (122 hp), 5MT

For more details on the prices and configurations of LADA XRAY you can find the link

SKODA RAPID

Equipment	Specifications	Price, rub.)
		646 000
Active	1.6 MPI 5-speed Manual transmission / 90 hp
		777 000
Active
	1.6 MPI 5-speed Manual transmission / 90 hp	822 000
Ambition	1.6 MPI 5-speed Manual transmission / 110 hp
	1.6 MPI 6-speed Automatic transmission / 110 hp	925 000
Ambition	1.4 TSI DSG-7/125 HP
	1.6 MPI 5-speed Manual transmission / 90 hp	921 000
Monte carlo	1.6 MPI 5-speed Manual transmission / 110 hp
	1.6 MPI 6-speed Automatic transmission / 110 hp	1 024 000
Monte carlo	1.4 TSI DSG-7/125 HP
	1.6 MPI 5-speed Manual transmission / 90 hp	867 000
Style	1.6 MPI 5-speed Manual transmission / 110 hp
	1.6 MPI 6-speed Automatic transmission / 110 hp	970 000
Style	1.4 TSI DSG-7/125 HP

For more details on the prices and trim levels of the Skoda Rapid you can find the link

As you can see, there is certainly a difference in price between Lada X Rey and Skoda Rapid. And if in the database it is almost invisible, then in the top it reaches an impressive amount of 125,000 rubles, which is a lot when buying a class B car. Nevertheless, buying Rapid in the top, you will get just a turbocharged 1.4-liter engine in a bundle with DSG preselective gearbox. Therefore, from the technical point of view, the overpayment is quite justified.

Optima complete set

But with the complete sets, everything is far from so simple. The fact is that AvtoVAZ and Skoda have a completely different approach to price lists. When buying X Ray, 3 fixed configurations are offered, as well as a surcharge of 12,000 rubles for a metallic color.

If you buy Rapid, then a lot of additional options are added to the equipment in the trim levels themselves, and even the top-end Style version can be very well equipped. In addition, options can be selected both in packages and individually. Naturally, the advantages of this approach are obvious, because you can order a car for yourself, choosing all the options you need. On the other hand, the price of Rapid, if it is equipped "in full", just soars to the skies and easily exceeds 1,000,000 rubles!

As you can see, it is most advisable to compare the Lada X Rey vs Skoda Rapid with 1.6-liter engines, since prices are about the same with them. Yes, the Czech liftback can be retrofitted, but the equipment of the Russian model is already quite generous, so the owner of X Ray is unlikely to feel left out.

In recent years, the Czech car manufacturer Škoda has been getting closer to the long-established market leaders. The company's models are already beginning to compete with each other, and today we will compare the Skoda Rapid and Skoda Octavia, as a result of which we will determine which is better and how they differ.

Let's start the comparison, of course, with the Skoda Octavia, which debuted back in 1996. Interestingly, most modern models are named after cars from the 50s - 60s of the last century, and the Octavia was no exception. It is worth noting that the debut modification of the car was based on the PQ34 module, which was also used in the design of many other European models. By the way, the Octavia was also assembled at factories in Ukraine and Russia.

In 2004, the second generation Octavia was presented, based on the updated PQ35 body. Interestingly, until 2010, the first and second generation models were produced in parallel. In 2012, Czech developers presented a third generation car, the dimensions of which have significantly increased compared to their predecessors. By the way, the car is recognized as one of the safest in the segment.

Skoda Rapid, which occupies a place in the company's hierarchy just below the Octavia, was presented relatively recently - in 2012. Interestingly, the Rapid has a lot in common with the debut modification of its today's opponent, and differs from it only in the wheelbase increased by 90 mm, as well as in the trunk capacity by 22 liters. From a security point of view, Rapid has surpassed his counterpart.

When making a choice - Skoda Rapid or Octavia, I want to give preference to the first option, even though Octavia's career is longer.

Appearance

At the first acquaintance with the appearance of cars, it may seem that they are exactly the same, but this is not entirely true. Yes, the body contours and some of the individual elements are completely identical, but if you look closely, you can understand what the difference is between the models.

Let's start from the front. The shape of the windshield is the same, but on the Octavia it is noticeably wider. The front bonnet and false radiator grille are made in the same style. The same can be said for the headlights of the LED optics. A neat air intake is installed on the stylish bumper of each of the cars, on both sides of which there are fog lights. In general, the front end of both cars has a fairly representative and solid appearance.

On the side, the situation is the same as on the front. A flowing, sloping domed roof, convex wheel arches, large doors and wide windows are a short description of the exterior profile of both Czech models. It is worth noting that on the Rapid side doors, you can see an additional stamping, which, according to company representatives, should give the car a distinctive character. As for aerodynamics, the good shape of the body allows both the Rapid and the Octavia to enter the air stream practically unhindered.

At the back, the cars are almost identical too. More precisely, all elements are identical, but only additional running lights are installed on the Octavia. And so, this is the usual compact tailgate, interesting headlights of the rear optics and a neat bumper.

Based on the foregoing, the most natural result of the confrontation at this point will be a draw.

Salon

Comparing the interior decoration of Octavia and Rapid, it should be said right away that the interior of the second is a much simplified version of the first. To be honest, no one expected anything else, but some fans of the company say that they would like more from the interior of the much-advertised Rapid.

So, the Octavia dashboard consists of several compartments. In the upper part there is a touch screen of the multimedia system, and just below there are climate and audio control units. The Rapid has a smaller monitor and fewer buttons and control levers.

Interestingly, the steering wheel of the Octavia has an unusual shape - its lower part is slightly flattened, which gives the impression that it is a "steering wheel" of a sports car. The Rapid has the same steering wheel structure, but only in a traditional round shape.

As for the quality of the finish, it is approximately on the same level for both cars. The same can be said for the spaciousness of the cabin.

Since the Rapid salon is a simplified version of the Octavia, we will give the advantage to the old man.

Specifications

For comparison, we have selected the modifications of 2017 cars with 1.4-liter gasoline engines. It is important to note that both Rapid and Octavia are very demanding on the "quality" of fuel, so it is better to refuel them with 95th gasoline.

Both cars have a lot in common. For example, a 7-speed robotic box is used as a transmission. A front-wheel drive system is also installed, and each engine is equipped with a turbine supercharger. As for the power, then, surprisingly, the difference is significant.

The Skoda Octavia engine produces 150 horsepower, while the Rapid has 125 “horses”, and this is taking into account the fact that the engine displacement is the same. This, of course, influenced the dynamics of the cars. For example, Octavia's acceleration time from zero to 100 is 8.2 s, which is 0.8 s faster than the opponent. Interestingly, the average consumption is also similar - 5.3 liters.

In terms of size, Octavia surpasses its counterpart in almost everything. For example, it is 187 mm longer than the Rapid, 15 mm higher, and the wheelbase is 78 mm longer. But the clearance is higher for Rapid - 170 mm, versus 155 mm for the opponent.

Also, the Octavia is 52 kg heavier than its current competitor, and the boot capacity is 38 liters more.

Price

Today, the average cost is 900,000 rubles. can be taken for about 610,000 rubles. Considering the similarity of the cars, Rapid is of course a more attractive option in terms of price.